SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.13713

Cross-sectoral emission interdependencies of waste management

Abstract

This study examines emission interdependencies within the waste sector and between waste and other economic domains, energy, transport, water, and communications, using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodologies with emphasis on process-based and hybrid approaches. The analysis employs the EXIOBASE multi-regional input-output database. Statistical correlation is applied to identify commonalities and divergences in emission drivers. Results indicate strong correlations among certain landfill waste streams, particularly organic-based materials, as well as links between plastics and wood, suggesting shared decomposition or management pathways. Moderate correlations appear in cross-sectoral interactions, especially between waste, energy, and transport, while weak correlations are observed in processes with distinct treatment mechanisms, such as landfill versus wastewater. Methodologically, the study highlights challenges posed by high-dimensional datasets, including multicollinearity, which limit the effectiveness of linear models. These findings underscore the complexity of sectoral interdependencies and the need for both integrated and material-specific strategies. By demonstrating how systemic tools like EXIOBASE can capture these linkages, the research provides a foundation for constructing more robust emission models and informing targeted mitigation policies. The results contribute to advancing environmental accounting frameworks while offering practical insights for emission reduction planning across interconnected sectors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nikolaos Kalyviotis, Georgina Calypso Kalogerakis, Georgios Kolliopoulos. 2026-09-12. Cross-sectoral emission interdependencies of waste management. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13713

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Screening Out the Needy: The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements

We examine the effectiveness of work requirements as a screening device in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Work requirements for "able-bodied adults without dependents" were suspended after the Great Recession and gradually reinstated across counties and states in the 2010s. Using linked administrative SNAP and employment data from five states and a triple-differences design, we find that work requirements reduce SNAP participation by seven percent without increasing labor supply and disproportionately screen out low-income individuals. We develop a welfare framework to interpret these results and find that the social costs of work requirements exceed budget savings.

econ.GN