SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.14247

What Input Resolution Is Required for Bird Species Identification, and What Is Its Latency Cost on an Edge Device? A Study of 14 Input Resolutions and Six Architectures with On-Device Measurements

Abstract

Bird-strike mitigation at wind farms requires identifying distant birds that span only tens of pixels, so the classifier's input resolution N is a design variable, not a fixed specification. We study it with a factorial design over 14 side lengths N (16 to 224), six architectures, two training and evaluation regimes and 30 random seeds -- 2,520 checkpoints and 5,040 evaluations -- plus latency measured on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano. Four results. (1) The selected N depends on the target: 0.90 is met on validation by ResNet50 at N=112 in an estimated 1.85 ms (0.8980 on test) and 0.95 by DINOv2-L at N=144 in 12.70 ms; changing the model buys more accuracy than raising N (+5.93 versus +2.33 points at N=112). (2) The benefit of lowering N depends on the assumed preprocessing path: N=224 -> 80 saves 13.5% when each individual is decoded from its own file but 46.2% when the detector decodes the 4K frame once; the Pareto set grows from 20 to 23 configurations. (3) Accuracy must be measured on the deployed engine: half precision costs ViT-S/16 alone 4 to 7 points at N>=96 while the CNNs stay within 0.1 points, and with selection held at validation the choice differs at 26 of 176 targets. A broken FP16 engine can run faster than a correct one, undetectable from latency; admitting 14 ViT-S/16 FP32 configurations moves the recommendation over the 0.931-0.938 band and under the 10 ms budget. (4) ViT-L-scale models fit this device, but activations exceed the FP16 range; splitting the graph at transformer-block boundaries confines FP32 to the affected segments, making the deployed DINOv2-L chain 1.85x faster than the single-engine build. We also quantify how the regime-difference sign stabilises with seed count; a sensitivity split removing some forms of group sharing preserves all 14 non-trivial signs at the selection boundary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Takeshi Nishikawa. 2026-09-13. What Input Resolution Is Required for Bird Species Identification, and What Is Its Latency Cost on an Edge Device? A Study of 14 Input Resolutions and Six Architectures with On-Device Measurements. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14247

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SSP-GNN: Learning to Track via Bilevel Optimization

We propose a graph-based tracking formulation for multi-object tracking (MOT) where target detections contain kinematic information and re-identification features (attributes). Our method applies a successive shortest paths (SSP) algorithm to a tracking graph defined over a batch of frames. The edge costs in this tracking graph are computed via a message-passing network, a graph neural network (GNN) variant. The parameters of the GNN, and hence, the tracker, are learned end-to-end on a training set of example ground-truth tracks and detections. Specifically, learning takes the form of bilevel optimization guided by our novel loss function. We evaluate our algorithm on simulated scenarios to understand its sensitivity to scenario aspects and model hyperparameters. Across varied scenario complexities, our method compares favorably to a strong baseline.

cs.CV

AdaptiveCDM: Source-Free Few-Shot Domain Adaptation for Cell Detection in Microscopic Images

Cross-domain cell detection for microscopic images suffers from performance degradation due to distribution shifts across imaging domains. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) strategies, attempt to overcome domain sift without requiring annotated data from target. However, requirement of availability of annotated data from the source domain and large-size data from target domain are both challenging limitations for realistic scenarios. This is especially true in medical imaging, where privacy requirements might prevent access to annotated source data, and costly data acquisition restricts extensive sampling of the target domain. To address these challenges, we propose AdaptiveCDM, a modular framework for Source-Free Few-Shot Domain Adaptive Object Detection (SF-FSDAOD) setting, that adapts a pretrained source model using only few labeled target images without accessing source data. AdaptiveCDM combines Resolution-Aware Augmentation (RAug) and Category-Aware Representation Learning (CARL). RAug alleviates the scarcity and class imbalance by augmenting instance balanced training examples, while preserving the scale fidelity and morphological properties of cellular structures. CARL enhances discriminative representation learning by encouraging class-consistent proposals, improving both localization and classification. We also introduce two competitive baselines for proposed setting: Faster-FreeShot and MT-FreeShot. Our approach achieves 40.4/43.4 mAP0.5 on M5 and 67.1/75.5 mAP0.5 on Raabin-WBC under 2-/5-shot adaptation. Despite using only a few labeled target images and no source data, AdaptiveCDM achieves competitive or superior performance compared with SOTA methods under their respective supervision settings. Ablations and qualitative analyses further substantiate the contribution of each component and the effectiveness of AdaptiveCDM in low-data regimes. Code/models will be available.

cs.CV

Uncertainty-Weighted Fusion of Image and Synthetic Event for Video Anomaly Detection

Most existing video anomaly detectors rely on RGB frames alone, which limit their ability to capture abrupt or transient motion cues that are critical for identifying anomalous events. We propose Uncertainty Weighted Image Event Fusion (IEF-VAD), a framework that integrates complementary RGB and synthetic motion information through a principled weighting mechanism. The method models the high variance and heavy tailed characteristics of synthetic motion cues with a Student's t likelihood, computes value level inverse variance weights using a Laplace approximation to prevent the image modality from overshadowing motion information, and performs iterative refinement to suppress residual cross modal noise. This formulation provides a more balanced and reliable fusion process compared to cross attention or gating based approaches that often suffer from modality dominance. Without requiring an event camera or frame level annotations, IEF-VAD achieves new state of the art performance on multiple real world anomaly detection benchmarks and remains stable under degradation applied to individual modalities. The results indicate that extracting and integrating complementary motion cues is an effective direction for robust video understanding across diverse environments.

cs.CV