SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.15492

Single-Machine Scheduling with Interval Predictions and Costly Preemption

Abstract

We study the single-machine total-completion-time problem $1||\sum C_j$ when processing times are unknown but each job comes with a reported interval. Jobs are initially processed in nondecreasing order of reported upper bound. If a job is still unfinished after receiving that much service, the reported upper bound has been violated and the policy switches to a resumable geometric fallback. Each interruption of an unfinished job incurs an additive penalty $κ$. For a residual set of $m$ jobs, known size ratio $D=s_1/s_0$, normalized interruption penalty $λ=κ/s_0$, and geometric depth $K$, we derive an explicit worst-case coefficient $Ψ_{m,D,λ}(K)$. When $λ>0$, a finite minimizing depth exists and can be chosen after the trigger from the observed number of unfinished jobs; the optimal depth decreases with the interruption penalty and increases with the residual set size. We also derive the exact worst-case coefficient $R_{n,D}$ for an arbitrary nonpreemptive list when all processing times lie in a known bounded range. These bounds give guarantees for valid intervals, a single interval failure, arbitrary reports, no-trigger outcomes, and random instances. In the single-failure regime, they also give a precise condition under which the proved fallback guarantee is smaller than the bounded-range continuation guarantee.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lachlan Bridges. 2026-09-14. Single-Machine Scheduling with Interval Predictions and Costly Preemption. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15492

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS

Approximating Prize-Collecting TSP below 1.556

The prize-collecting traveling salesperson problem is a variant of the metric traveling salesperson problem in which vertices may be left unvisited by paying their associated penalties. The objective is to minimize the length of the tour plus the total penalty of the unvisited vertices. Blauth, Klein, and Nägele gave the previously best-known LP-relative $1.599$-approximation. We show that a simpler version of their algorithm, obtained by omitting the splitting-off preprocessing before the tree decomposition, has an LP-relative approximation ratio of $1.555761$. The improvement comes entirely from a new analysis of the parity-correction step: a simple analysis already gives $1.56$, and the stated factor follows from a numerical parameter search with exact verification.

cs.DS