SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.17620

Democratizing Clinical Tumor Whole Genome Sequencing: 18-hour End-to-end Analysis via Trillion-parameter Large Language Models Locally Deployed on Consumer-grade Hardware

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is essential for precision oncology, yet its clinical adoption remains limited by prohibitive computational costs and multi-day turnaround times. This work presents a fully localized low-resource framework enabling stable deployment of a trillion-parameter biomedical LLM on a single consumer-grade RTX 4060 laptop with 32GB system memory and 8GB VRAM, as well as on routine clinical workstations in general hospitals, completing the entire tumor-paired WGS workflow from raw FASTQ input to clinical-grade full-variation-spectrum report output. Under standard 30X depth configurations, our implementation finishes a single tumor-paired WGS analysis within 18 hours, achieving 99.62% F1 score for somatic variant detection with over 99.9% concordance to the industrial-standard A100 cluster pipeline, fully meeting clinical oncology accuracy requirements. Quantitative profiling shows adaptive heterogeneous memory scheduling accounts for 71% of total execution time, while model optimization introduces less than 9% of total detection error. This work is the first engineering implementation of trillion-parameter biomedical LLM-driven clinical-grade genomic analysis on consumer-grade hardware, breaking the industry paradigm that trillion-scale genomic LLMs require hundred-thousand-dollar GPU clusters and multi-day turnaround, establishing a low-resource pathway for global primary medical institutions to adopt whole-genome precision oncology at zero additional cost.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rui Xiao, Yili Xu. 2026-09-14. Democratizing Clinical Tumor Whole Genome Sequencing: 18-hour End-to-end Analysis via Trillion-parameter Large Language Models Locally Deployed on Consumer-grade Hardware. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17620

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Transcriptomic Models for Immunotherapy Response Prediction Show Limited Cross-cohort Generalisability

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy; yet substantial proportion of patients exhibit intrinsic or acquired resistance, making accurate pre-treatment response prediction a critical unmet need. Transcriptomics-based biomarkers derived from bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offer a promising avenue for capturing tumour-immune interactions, yet the cross-cohort generalisability of existing prediction models remains unclear.We systematically benchmark nine state-of-the-art transcriptomic ICI response predictors, five bulk RNA-seq-based models (COMPASS, IRNet, NetBio, IKCScore, and TNBC-ICI) and four scRNA-seq-based models (PRECISE, DeepGeneX, Tres and scCURE), using publicly available independent datasets unseen during model development. Overall, predictive performance was modest: bulk RNA-seq models performed at or near chance level across most cohorts, while scRNA-seq models showed only marginal improvements. Pathway-level analyses revealed sparse and inconsistent biomarker signals across models. Although scRNA-seq-based predictors converged on immune-related programs such as allograft rejection, bulk RNA-seq-based models exhibited little reproducible overlap. PRECISE and NetBio identified the most coherent immune-related themes, whereas IRNet predominantly captured metabolic pathways weakly aligned with ICI biology. Together, these findings demonstrate the limited cross-cohort robustness and biological consistency of current transcriptomic ICI prediction models, underscoring the need for improved domain adaptation, standardised preprocessing, and biologically grounded model design.

q-bio.GN

Large Language Model Agents for Evidence Based Genetic Disease Severity Classification

Disease severity classification for genetic conditions is subjective and labor-intensive, creating bottlenecks in genomic screening, where commercial panels vary widely in size and overlap. We developed an autonomous AI agent integrating Reasoning and Acting (ReAct) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to classify 10,211 Human Phenotype Ontology terms. It uses American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)-endorsed severity guidelines and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) quality-of-life criteria to retrieve PubMed literature, generate interpretable reasoning chains, and independently verify claims. At the phenotype level, using expert-curated cohorts, the agent achieved 93.55% accuracy (MCC 0.9237) with 82.6% to 91.4% of claims supported by direct evidence or valid inferences. Gene-level severity was aggregated across 8,738 pairs, identifying 3,283 autosomal recessive pairs with severe or profound presentations. External validation showed 95.2% concordance with Mackenzie's Mission gene list. This system enables standardized panel design by providing reliable, automated classification supported by direct evidence.

q-bio.GN

Harmonised benchmarking of foundation models for single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveals context-dependent generalisation

Single-cell and spatial foundation models promise transferable biological representations, yet their generality remains largely untested across modalities, biological domains and analytical tasks. We benchmarked six representative models, Nicheformer, CellPLM, scGPT-spatial, GenePT, scELMo and Novae, using a harmonised framework spanning scRNA-seq, spatial transcriptomics and Perturb-seq. We evaluated zero-shot and continually pretrained clustering, supervised annotation, marker-gene concordance and perturbation prediction. Model performance was strongly conditional: expression-trained cell-level transformers best resolved many cell-identity tasks, spatial and graph-aware models better preserved tissue architecture, and language-derived gene embeddings were competitive for selected perturbation-response metrics. No model dominated across tasks, and rankings shifted with modality, preprocessing, tokenisation, biological prior, domain shift and metric choice. This benchmark provides practical guidance for model selection and argues that future models should be judged by biological generalisation, interpretability and perturbation-grounded validity, not by scale or leaderboard performance alone.

q-bio.GN