Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.18970

"What's going to happen after I'm gone?": Parent Perspectives on Technology in Supporting Independent Living for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities

Alexander Tyshka·Andrea Macklem-Zabel·Absalat Getachew·Foong Ling Chen·Wing-Yue Geoffrey Louie
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are increasingly transitioning from family homes towards semi-inde\-pendent living. As parents hand off the role of primary caregiver, they face numerous challenges in arranging consistent and quality support. Our research centers on understanding these caregiving routines. By focusing on the unique lived experience of parents, who possess extensive explicit and tacit knowledge of their adult child's requirements, we aim to map the management of care they provide. This foundational understanding is essential to identifying how assistive technologies can effectively serve a key role in supporting adults with IDD in this transition. In this work, we interviewed 16 parents of adults with IDD beginning this transition to understand: 1) how they currently provide support for daily living and what makes their support effective; 2) what their experiences and perceptions are regarding the use of technology; and 3) how they envision assistive technology successfully integrating with their adult child's new home or with other supports to promote independence. Our thematic analysis produced four themes: common modes of support, inside the routine to support growth, the fragility of continuity of care across transitions, and participants' perceptions and experiences of assistive technology. Building on these findings, we derive four design principles for growth-oriented assistive technology. These include pre-transition onboarding to capture caregiver tacit knowledge; structured scaffolding towards long-term growth; adaptive sensing that responds to day-to-day variability; and customization for the individual balanced with consistency for the care network.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Tyshka, Andrea Macklem-Zabel, Absalat Getachew, Foong Ling Chen, Wing-Yue Geoffrey Louie. 2026-09-16. "What's going to happen after I'm gone?": Parent Perspectives on Technology in Supporting Independent Living for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1145/3797867.3829043

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Robotic Tele-Operation for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Microsurgery: System Design and Validation

Upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) treatments frequently employ transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) for procedures such as the removal of tumors or polyps. In TLM, a laser beam is used to cut target tissue, while forceps are employed to grasp, manipulate, and stabilize tissue within the UADT. Although TLM systems may rely on different technologies and interfaces, forceps manipulation is still predominantly performed manually, introducing limitations in ergonomics, precision, and controllability. This paper proposes a novel robotic system for tissue manipulation in UADT procedures, based on a novel end-effector designed for forceps control. The system is integrated within a teleoperation framework that employs a robotic manipulator with a programmed remote center of motion (RCM), enabling precise and constrained instrument motion while improving surgeon ergonomics. The proposed approach is validated through two experimental studies and a dedicated usability evaluation, demonstrating its effectiveness and suitability for UADT surgical applications.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

HERMES: A Holistic End-to-End Risk-Aware Multimodal Embodied System with Vision-Language Models for Long-Tail Autonomous Driving

End-to-end autonomous driving models increasingly benefit from large vision-language models for semantic understanding, yet safe and reliable planning under long-tail conditions remains challenging, particularly in mixed-traffic environments involving heterogeneous road users and rare safety-critical interactions. This paper proposes HERMES, a holistic risk-aware end-to-end multimodal driving framework that explicitly incorporates long-tail semantic knowledge into trajectory planning. HERMES employs a foundation-model-assisted annotation pipeline to construct structured Long-Tail Scene Context and Long-Tail Planning Context, capturing hazard-centric scene information, maneuver intent, and risk-aware planning guidance. A Tri-Modal Driving Module then integrates multi-view visual observations, historical ego-motion, and long-tail semantic instructions through intent- and risk-aware conditioning for trajectory generation. Extensive experiments on a large-scale real-world long-tail driving benchmark demonstrate consistent improvements over representative recent baselines in overall planning performance and across diverse safety-critical scenarios. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness and complementary roles of the major components within HERMES.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

EgoPush: Egocentric Multi-Object Rearrangement for Mobile Robots via Constrained Teacher Observability

Humans rearrange objects in cluttered environments using egocentric perception, actively moving to keep task-relevant spatial cues in view. Mobile robots have not matched this: rearrangement is usually built on a global pose estimate or a map, which is exactly what a robot carrying one camera lacks, while pushing keeps changing the scene it would have to be built from. We present EgoPush, which pushes objects into anchor-relative formations from onboard RGB-D alone, with no global localization, external tracking, or map at deployment, and transfers zero-shot to a TurtleBot in controlled and visually cluttered scenes. What makes this learnable turns out to be a property of the teacher rather than of the student: three privileged teachers trained with identical rewards, architecture, and hyperparameters all exceed $98\%$ success, yet their distilled egocentric students reach $0\%$, $54.8\%$, and $87.3\%$, the only variable being the teacher's observation function. EgoPush therefore trains the teacher under egocentric observability constraints, restricting it to visibility-limited cues and revealing target references only when the anchor is centrally visible, so that its supervision is recoverable by a depth-based student distilled online. Making the teacher trainable in the first place needs two further pieces: a role-grouped object-centric interface shared by teacher and student, and stage-wise temporally decayed rewards for long-horizon credit assignment. Videos, the playable task, and code are available at https://ai4ce.github.io/EgoPush/.

cs.RO↗