SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.20351

Two-sided linear hashing and quadratic density bounds for smooth lattice coverings

Abstract

We study random linear projections of a finite-field subset for which every fiber has cardinality close to its mean. We bound the mean fiber size needed to ensure that all fibers satisfy a prescribed relative discrepancy, with a prescribed failure probability. For $S\subseteq\mathbb F_q^n$ projected to $\mathbb F_q^b$, one theorem gives three regimes: at fixed discrepancy and failure probability, sufficient mean fiber sizes are $O(q2^b)$ for arbitrary $q$, $O(q^2)$ when $q$ is at least a suitable constant multiple of $b$, and $O_q(b)$ for fixed $q$. The resulting entropy loss over fixed fields is $h-b=\log_q h+O(1)$, where $h=\log_q|S|$ is the input entropy. This matches the order of the binary obstruction of Alon, Dietzfelbinger, Miltersen, Petrank, and Tardos (1999); we give a quantitative random-source refinement over every fixed field. Our proof combines a quotient-and-average counting lemma with the local balanced/unbalanced argument of Dhar and Dvir (arXiv:2204.01665) and Furstenberg estimates of Dhar and Dvir and Kumar and Mon (arXiv:2609.17020). We apply these bounds in the reduction of Ordentlich, Regev, and Weiss (arXiv:2311.04644) to improve their $O(n^3)$ bound for smooth lattice coverings to $O(n^2)$. For each fixed convex body $K\subseteq\mathbb R^n$, a Haar-Siegel random lattice of covolume one has the number of lattice points in every translate of $K$ within a prescribed relative error of $\operatorname{vol}(K)$, with prescribed high probability, once $\operatorname{vol}(K)\ge Cn^2$ and $n$ is sufficiently large. The constant and dimension cutoff depend only on the error and failure probability. Complements of higher-rank Kakeya sets of Kopparty, Lev, Saraf, and Sudan (arXiv:1003.3736) show that no hashing guarantee for arbitrary subsets can yield a smaller order in the same reduction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ben Lund. 2026-09-17. Two-sided linear hashing and quadratic density bounds for smooth lattice coverings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20351

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO