SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.20492

Nonexistence of a Leech Tree of Order 18: A Computer-Assisted Proof

Abstract

A Leech tree of order $n$ is a tree with positive integral edge weights whose $n(n-1)/2$ pairwise weighted distances are precisely $1,2,\ldots,n(n-1)/2$. This paper gives a computer-assisted proof that no Leech tree of order $18$ exists. The argument has three layers. First, a development in Lean 4 verifies the structural facts used in the paper. These facts reduce every putative example to one of eight local configurations and justify several necessary conditions. Second, conventional mathematical arguments prove a component-pair whole-block exact-cover condition and the completeness of a recursive search. Third, exhaustive computations close all eight configurations. The computation records exact coverage, source and input hashes, terminal receipts, and checked exact-zero results. The structural layer is kernel-checked, but the search program, its execution, and the certificate checker have not been formalized in Lean. The result is therefore a computer-assisted proof, not an end-to-end Lean proof.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maseeh Ghodsi. 2026-09-17. Nonexistence of a Leech Tree of Order 18: A Computer-Assisted Proof. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20492

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO