Ageing, Digital Literacy, and Interaction Modality in Immer-sive Virtual Reality: Psychomotor Performance, Cognitive Flexibility, and Their Processing-Speed Association

Panagiotis Kourtesis; Katerina Denaxa; Lydia Asimakopoulo; Petros Roussos; Maria Roussou

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.20719

Ageing, Digital Literacy, and Interaction Modality in Immer-sive Virtual Reality: Psychomotor Performance, Cognitive Flexibility, and Their Processing-Speed Association

Panagiotis Kourtesis·Katerina Denaxa·Lydia Asimakopoulo·Petros Roussos·Maria Roussou

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Extended reality (XR) increasingly supports training and cognitive assessment, yet the age sensitivity of its interaction techniques is unclear. This study examined age, digital literacy, and interaction modality as correlates of psychomotor and cognitive-flexibility performance in immersive virtual reality (VR). Two hundred and two adults (19-90 years) completed a five-mode Fitts' law task (eye-gaze, head-gaze, controller ray-casting, virtual finger, and controller direct touch), the Trail Making Test in VR (TMT-VR), and a digital-literacy questionnaire. Age was associated with slower task times across modes, but controller direct touch carried the steepest relative age gradient yet remained among the fastest in absolute terms; technique altered relative age sensitivity without determining absolute efficiency. Higher digital literacy was associated with faster TMT-VR completion but not Fitts task times. A Fitts-derived speed score predicted TMT-VR performance beyond age and partly accounted for its age association, consistent with shared processing-speed variance; an exploratory full-battery extension confined the Fitts-score association to completion-time and error-adjusted-time indices and the digital-literacy association to error-adjusted-time indices, not wrong-target errors, mean selection distance, or relative Part B indices. Age-inclusive XR assessment should standardise interaction modality, evaluate rather than exclude mid-air direct selection, and interpret cognitive scores alongside digital literacy and psychomotor speed.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC cs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Panagiotis Kourtesis, Katerina Denaxa, Lydia Asimakopoulo, Petros Roussos, Maria Roussou. 2026-09-17. Ageing, Digital Literacy, and Interaction Modality in Immer-sive Virtual Reality: Psychomotor Performance, Cognitive Flexibility, and Their Processing-Speed Association. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20719

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Explanation Navigator: Rectifying Out-of-Scope Human Interpretations of Leaky AI Explanations through Conversational Guidance

As explanations of artificial intelligence systems proliferate, their recipients must grasp not only what they convey but also recognise what they cannot. We conducted an interview study with nine participants to examine how explainees reason when their information needs exceed the scope of available explanations. Participants often unwittingly confabulated explanatory insights when relevant information was missing from the explanations, not recognising the inherent limitations thereof. We characterise such explanations as leaky explanations -- simplifications that strive to hide complexity yet whose correct interpretation hinges on understanding of the concealed details. To address out-of-scope interpretations we propose Explanation Navigator: a conversational interaction framework that detects mismatches between users' information needs and explanations' content, elucidating pertinent yet implicit details and providing complementary explanations for unmet information needs. An online study with 316 participants showed that our approach allowed explainees to recognise and rectify confabulated explanatory insights, guiding them towards developing correct understanding.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Biased AI improves human performance but reduces perceived helpfulness

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly shapes how people think, engage, and evaluate information. To minimize risk, most current systems are designed to present as ideologically neutral with standardized output. Yet growing evidence suggests that these principles suppress cognitive engagement, impair human decision-making, and erode societal diversity. Here we test the opposite approach by deliberately injecting bias into AI assistants. In three randomized experiments with 5,000 participants, biased AI improved human performance relative to default and neutral AI in tasks ranging from misinformation evaluation and financial investment to graduate education. These gains carried a subjective cost. Participants systematically undervalued AI they believed to be biased and inflated the helpfulness of AI they believed to be neutral, regardless of the systems' actual behavior. Interacting with two AIs whose biases flanked the participant's own perspective preserved the performance gains while limiting the subjective cost and one-sided influence. Our findings reveal the strategic value of intentional bias in AI design. Rather than performing a single fair, reliable, and authoritative voice, AI that speaks from specific viewpoints triggers cognitive agency and elevates human-AI performance in judgment, decision-making, and problem-solving.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Learning Password Best Practices Through In-Task Instruction

Users often make security- and privacy-relevant decisions without a clear understanding of the rules that govern safe behavior. We introduce pedagogical friction, a design approach that inserts brief, instructional interactions at the moment of action. We evaluate this approach in the context of password creation, a familiar task with clear quality criteria. We conducted a randomized study with 128 participants across four interface conditions that varied the depth and interactivity of guidance. We assessed three outcomes: (1) rule compliance in a subsequent password task without guidance, (2) accuracy on survey questions tied to password rules, and (3) behavior-knowledge alignment, which captures whether participants who correctly followed a rule also recognized it on the survey. Across the guided conditions, participants corrected most rule violations in the follow-up task and showed high behavior-knowledge alignment. Survey results suggested clearer advantages for some rule types, especially symbol related questions. These results position pedagogical friction as a lightweight intervention for security- and privacy-critical interfaces.

cs.HC↗