SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.21388

Finite deletion-induced saturation for every non-complete graph

Abstract

A graph $G$ is deletion-induced-saturated for $H$ if $G$ has an edge, contains no induced copy of $H$, and deleting any edge of $G$ creates an induced copy of $H$. We prove, with finite certificate verification, that a finite graph $H$ admits such a finite graph $G$ if and only if $H$ is not complete. This resolves the deletion conjecture of Fan, Hajebi, Hajebi and Spirkl. The main step transfers suitable free amalgamations to finite extensions using a local lifting theorem of Auinger, Bitterlich and Otto. A second criterion treats edge addition by protecting specified nonedges and then taking a maximal induced-$H$-free completion. Structural results of Bonamy, Groenland, Johnston, Morrison and Scott reduce the remaining targets to dense templates and a finite hereditary class. Two uniform constructions in halved cubes handle the dense templates. The finite part is supported by exhaustive coverage certificates, structural certificates and explicit hosts, including a circulant graph on $30$ vertices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haochen Liu. 2026-09-18. Finite deletion-induced saturation for every non-complete graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21388

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO