SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.21615

Induced packing treewidth II. Excluding a clique or a biclique

Abstract

The notion of induced packing treewidth aims to unify classes defined by forbidden induced subgraphs or induced minors with classes defined by the existence of certain structured tree decompositions. For a graph $H$, \emph{induced $H$-packing treewidth}, denoted by $\treepi_{H}$, is a tree-decomposition-based graph parameter that, for each bag, measures the maximum number of pairwise anticomplete induced copies of $H$ intersecting that bag. This notion generalizes some previously studied parameters: when $H=P_1$, it is equivalent to tree-independence number, and when $H=P_2$, it is equivalent to induced matching treewidth. We prove the following: \begin{itemize}[itemsep=2mm,leftmargin=6mm] \item For all $a,t\in \mathbb{N}$, $K_{a,a}$-free graphs of bounded induced $P_t$-packing treewidth have bounded tree-independence number. This extends the previous result of Abrishami et al. [SIAM J. Discrete Math., 2025] for $t=2$, and a result of Hajebi and Spirkl who showed that $(P_t,K_{a,a})$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. \item If $H$ is any fixed path or a star, then the class of graphs of bounded induced $H$-packing treewidth is $χ$-bounded. Again, this extends the previous result of Abrishami et al. [SIAM J. Discrete Math., 2025] for $H=P_2$. \item Finally, we study the relationship between induced packing treewidth and \emph{sim-width}, a width parameter based on branch decompositions. We show that, although \emph{sim-width} and induced $P_3$-packing treewidth are incomparable, graphs of bounded sim-width that exclude all \emph{$H$-obstructions}---certain graphs that force large induced $H$-packing treewidth---have bounded induced $H$-packing treewidth. This simultaneously generalizes and resolves questions posed by Abrishami et al. [SIAM J. Discrete Math., 2025] and Brettell et al. [European J. Comb., 2025]. \end{itemize}

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amir Nikabadi, Paweł Rzążewski. 2026-09-18. Induced packing treewidth II. Excluding a clique or a biclique. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21615

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO