SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.22370

The maximum spectral radius of uniform hypergraphs whose shadow excludes a complete or complete bipartite minor

Abstract

For a $k$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal H$, the shadow of $\mathcal H$ is the graph whose edges are the pairs covered by a hyperedge. In this paper, for all sufficiently large $n$, we determine the $n$-vertex $k$-uniform hypergraphs of maximum adjacency-tensor spectral radius whose shadow has no $K_t$ minor, for every $t\ge k+1$, and those whose shadow has no $K_{s,t}$ minor, for every $2\le s\le t$ with $s+t\ge k+1$ and every residue of $n-s+1$ modulo $t$; outside these ranges the problems are trivial. This extends to uniform hypergraphs the theorem of Tait on graphs with no $K_r$ or $K_{s,t}$ minor, whose remaining residues were settled by Zhai and Lin. In each case the extremal hypergraph is unique, and it is the $k$-clique hypergraph of the join of a clique with a graph that we call the light part. For $K_{s,t}$ the answer depends on $j=k-s+1$. When $j\le1$, the maximum has order $n^{(k-1)/k}$, and the light part is the one found by Zhai and Lin for the adjacency matrix, including its exceptional components. When $j\ge2$, a regime that does not occur for graphs, the maximum has order $n^{(s-1)/k}$ and $t$ enters its leading constant. The light part then consists of copies of $K_t$ and one smaller clique, with a single exception: for $(k,s,t)=(9,8,8)$ and $n-s+1\equiv2\pmod 8$, the complement of the Petersen graph appears. When the smaller clique has between $1$ and $j-1$ vertices, the extremal graph is not unique. In particular, for $t=8$, $4\le s\le7$, $k=s+1$ and $n-s+1\equiv2\pmod 8$, the clique hypergraph of the extremal graph of Zhai and Lin is not extremal. For $j\ge2$ the light part is determined by a weighted clique inequality, which for $j\ge3$ follows from a weighted form of the closed-neighborhood counting of Chao and Dong.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pei Liu, Suil O. 2026-09-17. The maximum spectral radius of uniform hypergraphs whose shadow excludes a complete or complete bipartite minor. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22370

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO