Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.23017

Reconstructed holograms and explanation-aware evaluation for low-cost computational pollen analysis in veterinary cytology

Swarn Warshaneyan·Joial Danyal·Blaž Cugmas·Mindaugas Tamošiūnas·Edgars Kviesis-Kipge·Kirishanth Manivannan·Roberts Kadiķis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Automated pollen analysis supports veterinary cytology, but brightfield microscopy is costlier and more complex than lens-less digital in-line holographic microscopy. We evaluate whether reconstructed holograms can narrow this gap and whether model explanations remain reliable under modality change. Six pollen species were imaged by brightfield and holographic microscopy. Raw, single back-propagation and iterative phase retrieval holograms were evaluated with YOLOv26s detection and MobileNetV4 classification after anchor-based annotation transfer. Six attribution methods were assessed for spatial grounding and faithfulness with the Attribution Health Inspection and Repair (AHIR) protocol, which tests model brittleness under weak noise and corrects attribution-map granularity when needed. Brightfield achieved 0.6890 mAP50-95 (0.8865 mAP50) for detection and 0.9687 macro-F1 (0.9705 accuracy) for classification. Reconstructed holograms narrowed the gap with a task-dependent split: p-type was strongest for detection at 0.5324 mAP50-95 (0.8229 mAP50), while r-type was strongest for classification at 0.7695 macro-F1 (0.7866 accuracy), both far above raw-hologram baselines. Activation-based explanations localized strongly on grains, and region-based methods retained ~60 to ~80% of faithfulness under holography. The holographic detector was highly brittle to weak perturbations, saturating deletion-based evaluation while insertion remained informative. Pixel-level gradient explanations approached random floor, yet spatial smoothing restored p-type gradient faithfulness from 0.05 to 0.51. For holographic classification, perturbation-based explanations remained faithful while gradient-based methods fell below random floor. Reconstruction improves low-cost holographic pollen analysis, while AHIR distinguishes genuine attribution failure from artifacts caused by model brittleness and map granularity.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVcs.LGq-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Swarn Warshaneyan, Joial Danyal, Blaž Cugmas, Mindaugas Tamošiūnas, Edgars Kviesis-Kipge, Kirishanth Manivannan, Roberts Kadiķis. 2026-09-19. Reconstructed holograms and explanation-aware evaluation for low-cost computational pollen analysis in veterinary cytology. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Band-Attention Modulation Network for Robust Face Forgery Detection

Face forgery detection faces critical challenges in generalizing to unseen manipulation techniques and remaining robust under image compression, which often obscures subtle artifacts. Existing methods typically rely on fixed filters or coarse band separation, lacking the adaptability to learn task-specific spectral cues. To address this, we propose the Band-Attention Modulation Network (BAM-Net), a novel framework that pioneers learnable, fine-grained modulation of frequency components for forgery detection. At its core is the Band-Attention Modulation (BAM) mechanism, which transforms an image into its Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) spectrogram and learns to dynamically reweight frequency bands along anti-diagonals. This process effectively enhances forgery-related spectral signatures while suppressing less informative ones, simulating an adaptive "inverse compression" that counters information loss. The modulated frequency information is then fused with the spatial domain to guide a lightweight yet effective spatial backbone equipped with distance-decayed attention for comprehensive feature extraction. Extensive experiments on FaceForensics++, Celeb-DF, and DFDC datasets demonstrate that BAM-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance. More importantly, it exhibits exceptional generalization in cross-dataset, cross-compression, and cross-manipulation scenarios, underscoring the vital role of adaptive frequency band modulation in building robust forgery detectors.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Comparing YOLOv11 and YOLOv8 for instance segmentation of occluded and non-occluded immature green fruits in complex orchard environment

This study conducted a comprehensive performance evaluation on YOLO11 (or YOLOv11) and YOLOv8, the latest in the "You Only Look Once" (YOLO) series, focusing on their instance segmentation capabilities for immature green apples in orchard environments. YOLO11n-seg achieved the highest mask precision across all categories with a notable score of 0.831, highlighting its effectiveness in fruit detection. YOLO11m-seg and YOLO11l-seg excelled in non-occluded and occluded fruitlet segmentation with scores of 0.851 and 0.829, respectively. Additionally, YOLOv11x-seg led in mask recall for all categories, achieving a score of 0.815, with YOLO11m-seg performing best for non-occluded immature green fruitlets at 0.858 and YOLOv8x-seg leading the occluded category with 0.800. In terms of mean average precision at a 50\% intersection over union (mAP@50), YOLOv11m-seg consistently outperformed, registering the highest scores for both box and mask segmentation, at 0.876 and 0.860 for the "All" class and 0.908 and 0.909 for non-occluded immature fruitlets, respectively. YOLO11l-seg and YOLOv8l-seg shared the top box mAP@50 for occluded immature fruitlets at 0.847, while YOLO11m-seg achieved the highest mask mAP@50 of 0.810. Despite the advancements in YOLO11, YOLOv8n surpassed its counterparts in image processing speed, with an impressive inference speed of 3.3 milliseconds, compared to the fastest YOLO11 series model at 4.8 milliseconds, underscoring its suitability for real-time agricultural applications related to complex green fruit environments. Future work will compare YOLO26 (YOLOv26) and YOLO27 (YOLOv27) using the same dataset and training protocol.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Cross-Task Generalization in Handwriting-Based Alzheimer's Screening via Vision Language Adaptation

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder for which early detection is critical. Handwriting, which can be disrupted by subtle motor and cognitive decline, provides a non-invasive and cost-effective window for AD screening. Existing handwriting-based AD studies mostly rely on online trajectories and hand-crafted features, while the influence of handwriting task type on diagnostic performance and cross-task generalization remains underexplored. Meanwhile, large-scale vision--language models have demonstrated strong transfer and adaptation ability in natural-image anomaly detection and several medical modalities, such as chest X-ray and brain MRI. However, handwriting-based disease detection remains unexplored within this paradigm. To address this gap, we introduce a lightweight Cross-Layer Fusion Adapter (CLFA) framework that repurposes Contrastive Language--Image Pre-training (CLIP) for handwriting-based AD screening. CLFA inserts multi-level adapters into a frozen visual encoder, combining cross-layer feature fusion with depthwise 2D convolution on patch grids to capture both local stroke irregularities and higher-level handwriting structure. This design progressively aligns pretrained vision--language representations with AD-related handwriting cues and supports transfer from supervised source tasks to task-disjoint unseen target tasks. On the Darwin dataset, under the subject-disjoint cross-task protocol, averaged over all 600 task-disjoint source-target pairs, CLFA achieves 74.63\% AUC, 74.85\% accuracy, and 73.72\% F1 score, outperforming the best competing model by 2.15, 1.79, and 1.87 percentage points, respectively.

cs.CV↗