arXiv · 2609.25680
$\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{IP}$ Does Not Relativize
Abstract
We construct an oracle relative to which $\mathsf{BQP} \not\subseteq \mathsf{IP}$, resolving a long-standing open question in quantum complexity theory. Together with recent work due to Aaronson et al., our work also gives the first oracle separation between $\mathsf{IP}$ and $\mathsf{MIP}$, answering a question dating back to Fortnow's thesis. Our separation is based on the Forrelation problem, where given Boolean functions $f$ and $g$, the goal is to determine if $f$ is correlated with the Fourier spectrum of $g$. While this task is solvable by a query-efficient quantum algorithm, we show that it admits no classical interactive protocol with polynomial communication and a polynomial-query verifier. Our proof is based on (i) a new structural result showing how to approximate Avg-Max circuits (which are well-known to capture the power of interactive proofs in the oracular setting) by convex functions with small first and second derivatives and (ii) a novel analysis establishing that the Forrelation distribution suggested by Aaronson and Ambainis fools such functions. Our results imply that any prover-efficient classical interactive protocol for $\mathsf{BQP}$ must rely on non-relativizing techniques. This might serve as a partial explanation for the lack of progress towards doubly-efficient, unconditionally sound classical verification of quantum computation.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Adam Bouland, Andrew Huang, Anand Natarajan, Itay Shalit, Avishay Tal. 2026-09-22. $\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{IP}$ Does Not Relativize. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25680
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.