arXiv · 2609.26128
An Exact Noise Floor for Contingency-Table Effect Sizes: A Per-Table Reporting Gate, and How Often It Would Change Reported Magnitudes
Abstract
Cramer's V and the other chi-square-family effect sizes are positive under exact independence, so a reported value can be smaller than what the same statistic produces on a table with no association at all. The upward bias is classical (Tschuprow 1925; Bartlett 1937; corrected by Bergsma 2013), and reporting the boundary value, the critical effect size, beside the observed one has been recommended in general form (Perugini et al. 2025); we claim neither. Our contribution is two things a general recommendation does not supply. First, an exact per-table reporting gate: the noise floor V_0.95, the value the effect size reaches by chance 5% of the time under independence, computed from the exact margin-conditional law rather than the asymptotic critical value. The asymptotic floor miscalibrates where reporting is riskiest: on heterogeneous tables its false-alarm rate reaches 0.10 against a 0.05 target, while the exact floor holds nominal. Second, a measurement: across 4,129 real two-way tables from 291 public datasets, 21.8% of labeled effects (cluster-robust 95% CI 17 to 27%) sit on tables with no significant association. We recommend reporting V_0.95, in exact form on sparse or heterogeneous tables, beside every association measure and at the design stage.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
William J. Dwyer. 2026-08-11. An Exact Noise Floor for Contingency-Table Effect Sizes: A Per-Table Reporting Gate, and How Often It Would Change Reported Magnitudes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26128
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.