Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.28243

Ideal Membership in Polynomial Calculus: Complexity and Reductions

Alex Bortolotti·Monaldo Mastrolilli
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Ideal Membership Problem (IMP) asks whether a polynomial f belongs to an ideal of Q[x_1, ..., x_n]. Polynomial Calculus (PC) certifies membership by deriving f from the generators, and a degree-d derivation needs at most n^O(d) steps. We write PC-IMPd for the problem of producing a degree-bounded PC certificate, and call it solvable when one is guaranteed to exist and can be found in time n^O(d). Over Q, unlike over finite fields, a derivation may need exponentially many bits. We study PC-IMPd on instances arising from constraint satisfaction problems, and ask for which constraint languages L it is solvable. Our main contribution is a reduction framework for PC-IMPd, based on pp-definitions, pp-interpretations, and pp-encodings, that mirrors the algebraic approach to CSP complexity. Solvability is preserved by these constructions and, in the language of algebras, by passing to subalgebras, finite direct powers, and homomorphic images. We obtain new tractable classes over ternary and larger domains: every language closed under the median operation on a finite chain has solvable PC-IMPd, by reduction to the Boolean majority algebra, and in particular so does every language over {0, 1, 2} closed under a fixed-value majority. This also places IMPd(L) in P for such languages, advancing the classification of IMPd over ternary domains. In the process, we settle the last open case of the Boolean dichotomy for IMPd(L) and complete the Boolean classification of PC-IMPd(L) with an unconditional lower bound for an instance of PC-IMP1. A recent PC-to-SoS simulation reduces degree-automatability of Sum-of-Squares (the open problem of finding a degree-d SoS proof in time n^O(d) when one exists) to solvability of PC-IMPd. Each new tractable class therefore yields a family of constraint systems on which SoS proofs are degree-automatable.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alex Bortolotti, Monaldo Mastrolilli. 2026-09-23. Ideal Membership in Polynomial Calculus: Complexity and Reductions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Asymptotic Rank Speedup Theorems, Revisited

Motivated by fast matrix multiplication and recent connections between asymptotic tensor rank and fine-grained complexity, we revisit classical tools from the matrix multiplication literature and develop a framework for obtaining improved asymptotic rank upper bounds for tensors beyond matrix multiplication. In the 1980s, Coppersmith-Winograd and Strassen discovered a series of speedup theorems for asymptotic rank: in certain regimes, one can extract additional terms from a border rank upper bound on a tensor $T$, and then use these terms to obtain an improved asymptotic rank of $T$. We establish general speedup theorems that subsume these results and enable quantitative improvements. Two representative applications are: (1) The asymptotic rank of the small Coppersmith-Winograd tensor $\mathrm{cw}_q$ is less than its border rank. For instance, we prove the asymptotic rank of $\mathrm{cw}_2$ is smaller than $3.931$, improving on $\underline{\mathrm{R}}(\mathrm{cw}_2)=4$. It is known that if the asymptotic rank of $\mathrm{cw}_2$ equals $3$, this would imply $ω=2$. (2) A general improvement over Strassen's bound: we obtain an upper bound below $d^{2ω/3}$ on the asymptotic rank of any $d\times d\times d$ tensor. To make full use of speedups, we analyze degenerations in which both sides are nontrivial direct sums, a setting where the optimal quantitative bound one can achieve was previously unclear. We do so via an approach we call Strassen calculus: a systematic method for converting such degeneration data into explicit asymptotic rank bounds using Strassen's theory of the asymptotic spectrum.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Lettericity Is NP-Complete

The lettericity of a graph $G$ is the smallest size of a set $Σ$ such that there exist $w_1, \ldots, w_{|V(G)|} \in Σ$ and a decoder $D \subseteq Σ^2$ for which $G$ is isomorphic to the letter graph $(\{1, \ldots, |V(G)|\}, \{ij : 1 \le i < j \le |V(G)|, w_iw_j \in D\})$. It took around two decades of the study of lettericity for, in the simpler case of paths, a closed-form expression for its lettericity to be derived; this suggests that the question of whether the lettericity of an arbitrary graph can be computed in polynomial time is nontrivial. Indeed, this question has been raised repeatedly as an open problem in recent literature. We solve this problem by showing that the lettericity problem on arbitrary graphs is \textsf{NP}-complete (Theorem~10). We also prove that the coloring extension problem --- the same problem as lettericity, with the added condition that if $f$ is the isomorphism mapping from $G$ to the letter graph, $w_{f(v)} = χ(v)$ for a given coloring $χ$ of $G$ --- is \textsf{NP}-complete (Theorem~12). We also resolve the open problem of classifying the complexity of the word extension problem, which is the same problem as lettericity except that the $w_i$ are fixed; we show it to be \textsf{NP}-complete (Theorem~13), which, in tandem with our \textsf{NP}-completeness result for coloring extension, contrasts with the known result that when the constraint of the coloring extension problem and the constraint of the word extension problem are both applied to lettericity, lettericity can be decided in polynomial time. Additionally, we use the reduction in the \textsf{NP}-completeness proof to show that unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis is false, there cannot exist a deterministic algorithm to decide whether the lettericity of an $n$-vertex graph is at most~$k$ in time $2^{o(n)}$, even when $n = 6k$ (Theorem~11).

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Counting Small Induced Subgraphs: Hardness of Symmetry-Based Properties

Jerrum and Meeks (TOCT, JCSS 2015) introduced the counting problems $\text{IndSub}(Φ)$ for fixed graph properties $Φ$: Given an input graph $G$ and $k\in\mathbb N$, count the $k$-vertex subsets $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that the induced subgraph $G[S]$ satisfies $Φ$. For recursively enumerable $Φ$, it is known that $\text{IndSub}(Φ)$ is either #W[1]-hard or fixed-parameter tractable. A direct classification depending on $Φ$ however still remains open. In particular, the status was open for the property of graphs without nontrivial automorphisms, also mentioned in a very recent survey on parameterized counting by Roth (Comput.~Sci.~Rev.~2026). This is a natural property that evades all currently known techniques for proving #W[1]-hardness, including a general toolkit based on Fourier analysis that was very recently introduced by Curticapean and Neuen (SODA~2025). In this paper, we show that counting induced $k$-vertex graphs without nontrivial automorphisms is #W[1]-hard by constructing ``clique scaffolds'', i.e., problem-specific restrictions of the property that enable a reduction from the $k$-clique problem. More generally, we show that for every finite group $Q$, counting $k$-vertex induced subgraphs with automorphism group $Q$ is #W[1]-hard.

cs.CC↗