Moment Ambiguity and the Limits of Robust Stochastic Optimization

Abstract

We study fundamental information-theoretic limits of robust stochastic optimization when the distribution is known only through its exact moment sequence. We develop a unified framework that produces families of distinct distributions sharing all moments yet inducing radically different optimal decisions, thereby establishing strong impossibility results for a range of decision problems under moment ambiguity. Our approach gives two explicit constructions: a binary and an $N$-way construction showing that distributions with identical moment sequences can nevertheless exhibit arbitrarily different quantiles, order-statistics and threshold regions, forcing incompatible optimal actions. These families of distributions yield, in fact, strong impossibility results across several stochastic optimization problems. First, for the newsvendor problem, moment equivalence causes quantile ambiguity, inducing any fixed or randomized order quantity to fail arbitrarily badly. Second, for revenue maximization, no deterministic or randomized posted pricing scheme can secure a nontrivial approximation relative to the full-information benchmark. Third, for the secretary with cardinal observations setting, the worst-case robust value over all exact moment disclosures is exactly the classical $1/e$ finite-horizon value as opposed to the celebrated result of $0.58$ success probability with full-information by Gilbert and Mosteller (J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1966). We also recover and expand upon the recent impossibility result of Correa et al. (STOC, 2026) for prophet inequalities with moment knowledge. Indeed, exact moment knowledge can yield at best a $Θ(1/\log n)$ competitive ratio, even when competing against relaxed benchmarks based on expected $r$-th order statistics or when the algorithm is allowed to select $r$ items.