Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.31460

Segment-Level Agentic Topic Modeling for Improved Data Exploration and Resource Efficiency

Myeongjun Erik Jang·Antonios Georgiadis·Sae Young Moon·Fran Silavong
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Topic modeling is an effective technique for discovering hidden themes within documents and is widely used in text mining and data analysis across a variety of industry sectors. Recently, large language model (LLM)-based topic models have been emerged that prompt LLMs to generate topics then assign the topics to documents, producing more natural and human-readable topics than conventional topic modeling algorithms. However, the nature of topic assignment process causes certain drawbacks, such as the incapability to produce topic distributions over a document, too broad or narrow topics, and high resource consumption, which increases with the number and length of of documents being assigned topics. These issues are particularly critical for industrial applications, which require high-quality, in-depth analysis and the processing of large volumes of documents. In this context, this paper introduces a framework called SeLATM, which addresses these concerns by employing segment-level topic generation and topic refinement through agentic feedback loops. Experimental results on various datasets demonstrate that SeLATM significantly reduces the LLM resources compared to methods based on topic assignment process, while maintaining superior performance.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Myeongjun Erik Jang, Antonios Georgiadis, Sae Young Moon, Fran Silavong. 2026-09-25. Segment-Level Agentic Topic Modeling for Improved Data Exploration and Resource Efficiency. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31460

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AutoControl Arena: Synthesizing Executable Test Environments for Frontier AI Risk Evaluation

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, existing safety evaluations face a fundamental trade-off: manual benchmarks are costly, while LLM-based simulators are scalable but suffer from logic hallucination. We present AutoControl Arena, an automated framework for frontier AI risk evaluation built on the principle of logic-narrative decoupling. By grounding deterministic state in executable code while delegating generative dynamics to LLMs, we mitigate hallucination while maintaining flexibility. This principle, instantiated through a three-agent framework, achieves over 98% end-to-end success and 60% human preference over existing simulators. To elicit latent risks, we vary environmental Stress and Temptation across X-Bench (70 scenarios, 7 risk categories). Evaluating 9 frontier models reveals: (1) Alignment Illusion: risk rates surge from 21.7% to 54.5% under pressure, with capable models showing disproportionately larger increases; (2) Scenario-Specific Safety Scaling: advanced reasoning improves robustness for direct harms but worsens it for gaming scenarios; and (3) Divergent Misalignment Patterns: weaker models cause non-malicious harm while stronger models develop strategic concealment. Code and data are available at https://github.com/CosmosYi/AutoControl-Arena.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

NeuronSpark: Selective Spiking State Space Models with Adaptive Computation for Language Modeling

Spiking neural networks promise brain-inspired neural dynamics, yet native large-scale spiking language-model pretraining remains largely unexplored relative to conversion, distillation, and backbone-adaptation approaches. We diagnose a central obstacle: standard spiking neurons apply the same firing sensitivity to every token, creating dense- or silent-firing regimes that are difficult to resolve with globally tuned parameters alone. This problem is particularly acute in language modeling, where a single sequence contains tokens of vastly different informational roles, making a uniform firing regime poorly matched to the data. We address this with NeuronSpark, a self-attention-free language model built around input-dependent spiking membrane dynamics, where each neuron's decay rate, gain, and firing threshold adapt to the current token content. Together with gated associative memory and adaptive temporal aggregation, this selectivity enables billion-scale pretraining from random initialization without backbone transfer, conversion, or distillation. We relate the neuron to fixed-parameter spiking models and the memory to linear attention. At 1.1B parameters and 2.1B tokens, NeuronSpark reaches a 40.0 eight-task zero-shot average, exceeds comparable-budget Pythia/Mamba checkpoints, retains 95.2%/93.2% of their fully trained scores, and spontaneously develops a fast--slow hierarchy. At 2,048 tokens, parameter-matched VHDL points reduce operation-energy proxy by 90.1%/67.0% and cycles by 94.1%/80.3% versus Transformer/Mamba; a physical FPGA path reaches 24.000s TTFT and 0.082440 TPS.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Can Agents Price a Reaction? Evaluating LLMs on Chemical Cost Reasoning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable as tool-using agents, with benchmarks spanning diverse general agentic tasks. Yet rigorous evaluation of scientific tool use remains limited. In chemistry, recent agents can plan syntheses and invoke domain-specific tools, but evaluations often rely on curated demonstrations, expert assessment, or LLM-as-judge scoring rather than exact, judge-free ground truth. We address this gap with chemical procurement cost estimation, a practical task in which an agent must ground chemical identities, retrieve supplier quotes, select valid purchasable packs, normalize quantities, and compute cost from a reaction description. We introduce ChemCost, a benchmark of 1,427 evaluable reactions grounded to a frozen pricing snapshot covering 2,261 chemicals and 230,775 supplier quotes, supporting scalar scoring and stage-level diagnosis of grounding, retrieval, procurement, and arithmetic failures. To evaluate robustness, we further construct controlled noise-injected views that perturb chemical aliases, quantity expressions, missing fields, and input formatting. Experiments with frontier, open-weight, and chemistry-specialized LLM agents show that tool access is necessary but insufficient for solving the task. The strongest agents reach only 50.6% accuracy within 25% relative error on clean inputs and degrade substantially with realistic noise. Stage-level analysis further shows that failures arise from brittle parsing, ineffective evidence integration, invalid pack selection, and non-convergent tool use.

cs.AI↗