Statistical Testing for Multiple Instance Learning via Selective Inference with Applications to Computational Pathology

Abstract

Multiple instance learning (MIL) is widely used in computational pathology because it enables weakly supervised analysis of whole-slide images (WSIs) without requiring patch-level annotations. In attention-based MIL, instances with high attention scores are often interpreted as diagnostically important regions and used as visual explanations. However, attention scores alone cannot determine whether selected high-attention instances are significantly different from normal instances, limiting the reliability of attention-based explanations. In this paper, we formulate the evaluation of high-attention instances as a statistical hypothesis testing problem. Specifically, we assess whether a selected high-attention instance significantly deviates from a representative normal reference instance selected based on feature similarity. A major challenge is that both the target instance and the reference instance are selected through data-dependent procedures, rendering standard hypothesis testing invalid. To address this issue, we introduce a selective inference (SI) framework that explicitly accounts for the selection events induced by attention-based instance selection and adaptive reference selection, thereby enabling the computation of valid selective $p$-values conditional on these events. Experiments demonstrate Type-I error control on synthetic and MNIST-based data and practical applicability to pathological WSIs, with higher statistical power than the conventional over-conditioning approach.