arXiv · 2609.32004
Is invariance all you need for algorithmic fairness? Removing demographic information can create new bias
Abstract
Encoded demographic information in internal model representations is a commonly assumed risk factor for algorithmic bias, with demographic representation invariance often being touted as the ideal state. However, while demographic shortcut learning is a genuine threat, some degree of encoding is necessary when demographics correlate with target labels. Here, we show, mathematically and empirically, that enforcing demographic invariance can actually hamper bias mitigation and even create new biases. We distinguish marginal from class-conditional representation invariance, and show that they imply the standard group fairness notions of demographic parity and equalized odds, respectively. We evaluate the effects on predictive performance and fairness of enforcing both invariance types, both theoretically and empirically across five tabular and two chest X-ray imaging datasets. Our findings support our mathematical argument that demographic representation invariance is neither desirable nor sufficient for fairness.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Aditya Parikh, Eike Petersen, Stella Frank, Enzo Ferrante, Melanie Ganz, Aasa Feragen. 2026-09-25. Is invariance all you need for algorithmic fairness? Removing demographic information can create new bias. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32004
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.