Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.33526

Explicit Fractalizers: Prime-Order Paley Graphs and other Cayley Graphs

Abstract

The inducibility problem asks for the maximum number of induced copies of a fixed graph among all graphs with a prescribed number of vertices. Inducibility has been an active area of research in extremal combinatorics, but determining all extremal graphs for explicitly defined patterns remains challenging, particularly when the description is required to hold at every host order. A graph $H$ is called a fractalizer if, for every positive integer $n$, every $n$-vertex graph maximizing the number of induced copies of $H$ is a balanced iterated blow-up of $H$, obtained by recursively repeating the same pattern in parts whose sizes differ by at most one. Previous probabilistic results show that large random graphs and random abelian Cayley graphs are fractalizers with probability tending to one, establishing their abundance without directly providing explicit families. We prove that every sufficiently large prime-order Paley graph is a fractalizer. Thus these classical arithmetic patterns determine the exact recursive structure of every extremal host, at every host order and without any algebraic assumptions on the host. We also construct a second explicit infinite family of nontrivial Cayley fractalizers, for which the fractalizer property admits a simpler proof than in the Paley case. Together, these results resolve the explicit-construction question discussed at the 2025 American Institute of Mathematics workshop "Flag Algebras and Extremal Combinatorics."

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aldo Kiem, Fan Wei. 2026-09-27. Explicit Fractalizers: Prime-Order Paley Graphs and other Cayley Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33526

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Two poset polytopes are mutation-equivalent

The combinatorial mutation $\mathrm{mut}_w(P,F)$ for a lattice polytope $P$ was introduced in the context of mirror symmetry for Fano manifolds in [1]. It was also proved in \cite{ACGK} that for a lattice polytope $P \subseteq N_\mathbb{R}$ containing the origin in its interior, the polar dual $P^* \subseteq M_\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathrm{mut}_w(P,F)^* \subseteq M_\mathbb{R}$ have the same Ehrhart quasi-polynomial. To extend this framework, we introduce combinatorial mutation for rational pointed polyhedra in $N_\mathbb{R}$ containing the origin in their interiors. Such polyhedra are Minkowski sums of rational polytopes and rational polyhedral pointed cones. On the dual side $M_\mathbb{R}$, the construction applies to full-dimensional rational polytopes containing the origin, not necessarily in their interiors. As an application of this extension of the combinatorial mutation, we prove that the chain polytope of a poset $Π$ can be obtained by a sequence of combinatorial mutations in $M_\mathbb{R}$ from the order polytope of $Π$. Namely, the order polytope and the chain polytope of the same poset $Π$ are mutation-equivalent.

math.CO↗

Congruences of shifted Jack Littlewood-Richardson coefficients

The shifted Jack Littlewood-Richardson coefficients generalize the ordinary Jack coefficients and are Laurent polynomials in the Jack parameter $α$. We prove a previously conjectured congruence: coefficients indexed by triples differing by a single box move are congruent modulo the shared $α$-hook at the pivot. We also prove a shifted Macdonald analogue, with a power-of-$t$ twist, and establish that the normalized shifted Macdonald coefficients are Laurent polynomials in $q$ and $t$. The proofs combine coincidences of shifted coordinates with Laurent-preserving shift transforms, and the Macdonald input uses Knop's inversion formula and the integrality of the Bergeron-Garsia-Haiman-Tesler operators. Finally, we realize the Jack and Macdonald congruences as necessary edge conditions on Hilbert schemes of points, in equivariant cohomology and equivariant $K$-theory, respectively. In the Macdonald case a tautological determinant twist accounts for the power-of-$t$ normalization

math.CO↗

A 3-regular counterexample to the Bilu--Linial signing conjecture

We construct a finite connected simple cubic graph $F$ such that every signing of its edges yields a signed adjacency matrix with an eigenvalue outside $[-2\sqrt2,2\sqrt2]$. This disproves the Bilu--Linial signing conjecture for general regular graphs. The graph $F$ is not Ramanujan, and the conjecture restricted to Ramanujan base graphs remains open.

math.CO↗