Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.33550

Sparsity by Default: The Theory and Practice of ARD in Gaussian Process Regression for Variable Selection

Jia Cai
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Automatic relevance determination (ARD) is the standard device for input selection in Gaussian process (GP) regression. By giving the covariance kernel a separate lengthscale for every input and learning those lengthscales by maximizing the marginal likelihood, ARD lets the data decide which coordinates matter: irrelevant inputs receive very large lengthscales and are effectively switched off. We trace this mechanism to the Bayesian Occam's razor embodied in the marginal likelihood, derive the gradient through which it prunes inputs, and emphasize that ARD delivers effective rather than exact sparsity. We review the algorithms used in practice and the rules that turn lengthscales into selections, and we survey the asymptotic theory, distinguishing the fixed-domain identifiability obstruction on the lengthscales from the high-dimensional selection-consistency guarantees recently established for hierarchical GP priors, and noting what remains open for plain ARD. We compare ARD with spike-and-slab priors, sparse axis-aligned and global-local shrinkage priors including the Bayesian lasso and horseshoe, penalized likelihood kriging, sensitivity and projection criteria, and additive kernels. We argue that ARD endures because of its seamless integration with kernel learning, universal software support, and low cost, and we close with its limitations and remedies.

Explore related subjects

stat.MLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jia Cai. 2026-09-27. Sparsity by Default: The Theory and Practice of ARD in Gaussian Process Regression for Variable Selection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33550

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Certified Adaptive Refresh: Anytime-Valid Monitoring for Federated Conformal RAG

Question-answering services built on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), in which a language model answers from retrieved documents, are inspected continuously and upgraded repeatedly, so their reliability guarantee must survive both. We study federated conformal RAG: nodes holding private corpora score candidate answers with a shared language model and send compressed scores to a hub that returns an answer set; a miss omits the true answer. We formulate monitoring as a sequential test: alarm when misses exceed a certified bound on the miss rate (the allowance). But a conformal certificate covers one frozen configuration at one look fixed in advance, so it gives no anytime-valid alarm; a threshold calibrated for one model certifies nothing about its replacement; and re-certifying each upgrade at full error level compounds failures. We propose Anytime-FC-RAG with three auditable rules: pick each configuration before its fresh calibration, charge every certificate attempt to one trajectory-wide budget $δ_{\rm cal}$, and fix threshold, allowance and bet before each query. One betting wealth $E_t$, growing in expectation only when misses exceed the allowance, never resets across deployments. Our certified adaptive-refresh theorem shows that, with evidence budget $δ_e$, alarming when $E_t$ reaches $1/δ_e$ has false-alarm probability at most $δ_e + δ_{\rm cal}$ under a random number of history-selected, evidence-driven refreshes of model, retriever, corpus, score or threshold; $δ_{\rm cal}$ pays for wrong certificates. With an exact order-statistic certificate the bound is distribution-free, architecture-agnostic and about misses, not per-input coverage or distribution shift as such. On Qwen2.5/MMLU-Pro the alarm separated audited-harmful from benign shifts completely at a 5% budget; in a model swap, only fresh calibration kept a downgrade's miss rate in check.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Byzantine-Robust Federated RAG via Aligned Calibration and Fixed-Membership Conformal Prediction

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) lets language models answer questions more accurately by consulting relevant documents. Many valuable collections, such as medical records, cannot be pooled because of privacy rules. Federated RAG leaves each collection with its owner, or node, which scores candidate answers from its own documents; a central hub combines the scores. Some nodes, called Byzantine, may be compromised, faulty, or misled by instructions hidden in documents, and report arbitrary scores. Conformal prediction returns a set containing the correct answer with a chosen probability, using a cutoff set in a calibration step on questions with known answers. An unknown group of nodes, no larger than a declared bound, may misreport both in this step and at query time. Existing methods assume every node is honest or protect only the calibration step. We observe that the honest nodes are the same in both steps. The hub therefore has all nodes score the same calibration questions, and keeps a candidate only if some plausible group of honest nodes, using its own scores in both steps, would keep it. We prove that the resulting sets contain the correct answer with the chosen probability in finite samples, whatever the Byzantine nodes report. No method using the same information can return smaller sets without risking the loss of an answer the honest nodes support. If nodes fail at random, the guarantee weakens only by the probability that more nodes fail than declared. In simulations, on real question-answering tasks including medical exams, and with language models as nodes, some hijacked, our sets reached the target whenever no more nodes misbehaved than declared, while plain averaging could miss it. They were also clearly smaller than those of simpler methods with the same protection, most of all when the declared bound was generous, so a cautious bound costs little.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Hierarchical Utility Calibration for Structured Multiclass Decisions

In multiclass probabilistic prediction, Utility Calibration (UC), which focuses auditing on specified utilities, has recently received attention as a way to guarantee downstream decisions while controlling computational and sample requirements. At the same time, some multiclass problems have meaningful label hierarchies that play important roles in medicine and image classification, yet how UC evaluates utility within a hierarchy remains insufficiently understood. We show that the difference between realized utility and predicted mean utility admits an exact decomposition into a sum of contributions from the internal nodes of the label tree. This decomposition shows that positive and negative contributions from different nodes can cancel, and that even when UC is small, the utility errors remaining in parts of the hierarchy need not be small. To address this problem, we propose Hierarchical Utility Calibration (HUC), which evaluates each node contribution before summation while retaining the same target utility, subgroup, and predicted-utility interval. We further provide finite-sample evaluation over all predicted-utility intervals and propose HUC-Boost, which updates only violated internal nodes, with theoretical guarantees for both.

stat.ML↗