Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.35413

Reclaiming the social in social media

Abstract

Concerns about polarization, antisocial behavior, and mental health have broadly led to two responses to social media: adapting platforms through moderation and prosocial design, and restricting access to these platforms through age limits and comparable measures. Both address consequences of social media while leaving the attention-driven architecture intact. We argue that the harms commonly attributed to social media arise not from technologies supporting social connection but from their implementation within the attention economy. In response, we ask what a digital social environment built for genuine human connection would look like. From four principles - Purpose, Alignment, Transparency, and Access - we can derive four technical properties that fulfill these principles: Operator Blindness, Algorithmic Sovereignty, Operational Parity, and Verifiability. To the best of our knowledge, no deployed alternative satisfies all four. We propose an architecture that does, making the attention economy not just discouraged but structurally impossible. We explain how the resulting user experience refocuses on each user's individual social environment and differs from that of current platforms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luca Benn, Moritz Merz, David Grüning. 2026-09-28. Reclaiming the social in social media. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35413

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Influence Ranking Improvement via Link Addition in Social Networks

Social media platforms increasingly rely on influential users for information dissemination in domains such as marketing and political campaigns. As the value of being recognized as influential grows, users may have incentives to strategically enhance their influence. In this study, we investigate whether and to what extent the influence ranking of a target node can be improved by adding a limited number of outgoing links in the context of influence maximization (IM). We formulate the Link Selection Problem for Influence Ranking Improvement (LSP-IRI) as the problem of selecting a fixed-size set of additional outgoing links from a target node in order to maximize its rank improvement. To examine this problem, we consider two representative heuristic strategies: a greedy method that directly optimizes rank improvement and a computationally efficient random search method. We conduct experiments on four real-world networks ranging from thousands to hundreds of thousands of nodes. The results show that even a few added links can substantially improve IM-based influence rankings. In particular, the greedy method improves the ranks of nodes initially ranked around 50 by several tens of positions on average with only three added links, sometimes moving them into the top 10. The random search method achieves smaller gains under strict budgets but reduces computation time by up to approximately 98% compared with the greedy method and becomes effective when larger budgets are allowed. These findings show that IM-based influence rankings are sensitive to limited local structural modifications and highlight a trade-off between ranking improvement and computational efficiency.

cs.SI↗

Detection and Characterization of Coordinated Online Behavior: A Survey

Coordination is a fundamental aspect of life. The advent of social media has made it integral also to online human interactions, such as those that characterize thriving online communities and social movements. At the same time, coordination is also core to effective disinformation, manipulation, and hate campaigns. This survey collects, categorizes, and critically discusses the body of work produced as a result of the growing interest on coordinated online behavior. We reconcile industry and academic definitions, propose a comprehensive framework to study coordinated online behavior, and review and critically discuss the existing detection and characterization methods. Our analysis identifies open challenges and promising directions of research, serving as a guide for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in understanding and addressing the complexities inherent to online coordination. We also provide an interactive companion website for exploring the surveyed literature.

cs.SI↗

The Game is the Game: Dynamic network analysis and shifting roles in criminal networks

Objectives: This paper incorporates time as a crucial variable to identify key players in criminal networks and explores how actors' positions change over time. It then assesses the accuracy of the results against the uncertainty around network data collected from criminal justice records. Methods: Network data are from a judicial document for a two-year investigation targeting a drug trafficking and distribution network. We use Katz centrality in its dynamic version to explore changes in relationships and relative importance of network actors. We then use a novel method of introducing new edges to the network using Bernoulli random trials to simulate missing data and assess the extent to which node rankings based on Katz centrality change or remain the same when introducing some level of uncertainty to our observed network. Results: We identify actors who consistently held a central role over the course of the two-year investigation and differentiate them from actors who provided key contributions to the group's activities, but only for a limited period. We show that compared to centrality measures commonly used in criminal network analysis, dynamic Katz centrality is helpful to differentiate individual contributions even among central nodes and explore individual trajectories over time, even when data are incomplete. Conclusions: This paper demonstrates the value of key player identification using temporal network data and offers an additional analytical tool to both organised crime scholars trying to capture the complex nature of criminal collaboration and law enforcement agencies aiming at identifying appropriate targets and disrupting criminal groups.

cs.SI↗