Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.36389

Binomial Complexity of Multidimensional Arrays

Abstract

Binomial coefficients for multidimensional arrays count occurrences of particular configurations. For the sake of presentation, the emphasis is put on column-binomial coefficients for two-dimensional finite arrays. In this article, we first show that these coefficients can be computed through some Magnus transform. To get structural and combinatorial information on arrays, we then define \((k,\ell)\)-binomial equivalence for finite arrays and, from it, the \((k,\ell)\)-binomial complexity function of an infinite array. Roughly, two finite arrays are \((k,\ell)\)-binomially equivalent when they share the same number of subarrays of size at most $k\times \ell$. We obtain general results on the \((k,\ell)\)-binomial complexity of infinite arrays coding direct products of infinite words. Our main theorem gives an exact formula for the \((k,\ell)\)-binomial complexity of the two-dimensional Thue--Morse array. To that end, we closely examine the action of the bit-wise complement on the \(k\)-binomial equivalence classes of the factors of the Thue--Morse word.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mehdi Golafshan, Michel Rigo. 2026-09-28. Binomial Complexity of Multidimensional Arrays. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36389

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Two poset polytopes are mutation-equivalent

The combinatorial mutation $\mathrm{mut}_w(P,F)$ for a lattice polytope $P$ was introduced in the context of mirror symmetry for Fano manifolds in [1]. It was also proved in \cite{ACGK} that for a lattice polytope $P \subseteq N_\mathbb{R}$ containing the origin in its interior, the polar dual $P^* \subseteq M_\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathrm{mut}_w(P,F)^* \subseteq M_\mathbb{R}$ have the same Ehrhart quasi-polynomial. To extend this framework, we introduce combinatorial mutation for rational pointed polyhedra in $N_\mathbb{R}$ containing the origin in their interiors. Such polyhedra are Minkowski sums of rational polytopes and rational polyhedral pointed cones. On the dual side $M_\mathbb{R}$, the construction applies to full-dimensional rational polytopes containing the origin, not necessarily in their interiors. As an application of this extension of the combinatorial mutation, we prove that the chain polytope of a poset $Π$ can be obtained by a sequence of combinatorial mutations in $M_\mathbb{R}$ from the order polytope of $Π$. Namely, the order polytope and the chain polytope of the same poset $Π$ are mutation-equivalent.

math.CO↗

Congruences of shifted Jack Littlewood-Richardson coefficients

The shifted Jack Littlewood-Richardson coefficients generalize the ordinary Jack coefficients and are Laurent polynomials in the Jack parameter $α$. We prove a previously conjectured congruence: coefficients indexed by triples differing by a single box move are congruent modulo the shared $α$-hook at the pivot. We also prove a shifted Macdonald analogue, with a power-of-$t$ twist, and establish that the normalized shifted Macdonald coefficients are Laurent polynomials in $q$ and $t$. The proofs combine coincidences of shifted coordinates with Laurent-preserving shift transforms, and the Macdonald input uses Knop's inversion formula and the integrality of the Bergeron-Garsia-Haiman-Tesler operators. Finally, we realize the Jack and Macdonald congruences as necessary edge conditions on Hilbert schemes of points, in equivariant cohomology and equivariant $K$-theory, respectively. In the Macdonald case a tautological determinant twist accounts for the power-of-$t$ normalization

math.CO↗

A 3-regular counterexample to the Bilu--Linial signing conjecture

We construct a finite connected simple cubic graph $F$ such that every signing of its edges yields a signed adjacency matrix with an eigenvalue outside $[-2\sqrt2,2\sqrt2]$. This disproves the Bilu--Linial signing conjecture for general regular graphs. The graph $F$ is not Ramanujan, and the conjecture restricted to Ramanujan base graphs remains open.

math.CO↗