Rhythm Is a Dancer: Designing Interactive Rhythm Feedback for Beginner Dancers

Bettina Eska; Annika Kilian; Paweł W. Woźniak; Jakob Karolus

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.37641

Rhythm Is a Dancer: Designing Interactive Rhythm Feedback for Beginner Dancers

Bettina Eska·Annika Kilian·Paweł W. Woźniak·Jakob Karolus

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Learning how to dance can readily overwhelm beginners, especially without effective guidance from a dance teacher. Existing interactive systems often do not sufficiently support the learner's progress. We investigated how targeted feedback on rhythm keeping interactively supports dance practice for novice dancers by introducing SkeletonDance. Our design is grounded in motor learning theory and conceptualized through interviews with dance teachers, following established teaching strategies. SkeletonDance automatically detects rhythm flaws and provides assistance through mimicking clapping feedback, a common instructional technique in dance lessons. In our study, participants reported that SkeletonDance helped them to re-establish lost rhythm and increased confidence during practice, especially among novices. Though objective performance metrics did not consistently confirm these effects during controlled test sessions. Our work highlights that feedback can support novice dancers' subjective practicing experiences and demonstrates how prior dancing experience moderates the objective effectiveness of such minimal, teacher-inspired interventions.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Bettina Eska, Annika Kilian, Paweł W. Woźniak, Jakob Karolus. 2026-09-29. Rhythm Is a Dancer: Designing Interactive Rhythm Feedback for Beginner Dancers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37641

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beyond Judgment: Exploring Large Language Models as Non-Judgmental Support for Maternal Mental Health

In the age of Large Language Models (LLMs), much work has already been done on how LLMs support medication advice and serve as information providers; however, how mothers use these tools for emotional and informational support to avoid social judgment remains underexplored. This study conducted a 10-day mixed-methods exploratory survey ($N=107$) to investigate how mothers use LLMs as a non-judgmental resource for emotional support and regulation, and for situational reassurance. Our findings show that mothers are asking LLMs various questions about childcare to reassure themselves and avoid judgment, particularly around childcare decisions, maternal guilt, and late-night caregiving. Open-ended responses also show that mothers are comfortable with LLMs because they do not have to think about social consequences or judgment. Although mothers use LLMs for quick information or reassurance to avoid judgment, over half of the participants value human warmth more than LLMs; however, a significant minority, especially those in joint families, consider LLMs to avoid human judgment. These findings help understand how LLMs can be framed as low-risk interaction support rather than a replacement for human support, and highlight the role of social context in shaping emotional technology use.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Avoiding Social Judgment, Seeking Privacy: Investigating why Mothers Shift from Facebook Groups to Large Language Models

Social media platforms, especially Facebook parenting groups, have long been used as informal support networks for mothers seeking advice and reassurance. However, growing concerns about social judgment, privacy exposure, and unreliable information are changing how mothers seek help. This exploratory mixed-method study examines why mothers are moving from Facebook parenting groups to large language models such as ChatGPT and Gemini. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 109 mothers. Results show that 41.3% of participants avoided Facebook parenting groups because they expected judgment from others. This difference was statistically significant across location and family structure. Mothers living in their home country and those in joint families were more likely to avoid Facebook groups. Qualitative findings revealed three themes: social judgment and exposure, LLMs as safe and private spaces, and quick and structured support. Participants described LLMs as immediate, emotionally safe, and reliable alternatives that reduce social risk when asking for help. Rather than replacing human support, LLMs appear to fill emotional and practical gaps within existing support systems. These findings show a change in maternal digital support and highlight the need to design LLM systems that support both information and emotional safety.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Learning to Assign Prediction Tasks to Agents with Capacity Constraints

We address the problem of learning to assign prediction tasks to one agent from a set of available agents, including human decision-makers and AI models. We focus on sequential learning of agent expertise and assignment policies where each agent is constrained to handle a fraction of tasks. We provide a general theoretical characterization of this problem in terms of agent capacities, differences in agent expertise, and task context. We then develop a framework of sequential explore-exploit policy-learning algorithms that seek to maximize overall performance. Experimental results over a variety of tabular, image, and text prediction tasks demonstrate systematic gains from our policy-learning algorithms relative to non-contextual baselines across different types of agents, including LLMs and humans.

cs.HC↗