Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.37826

Nutrient Competition as a General Mechanism of Regulation in Photosymbiosis

Jordan A. Gault·Nils Rädecker·Iliana B. Baums·Thilo Gross
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Nitrogen limitation is a key mechanism regulating the mutualism between photosymbiotic cnidarians and their algal symbionts. Algal-derived photosynthate facilitates host assimilation of inorganic nitrogen, specifically ammonium. The resulting competition between symbiotic partners for inorganic nitrogen leads to a negative feedback loop wherein symbiont density is effectively controlled through facilitation of their competitor. However, it is unclear whether this feedback loop is sufficient to stabilize the interaction absent other forms of regulation. Using a generalized modeling approach, we identify the conditions under which cnidarian-algal competition for nitrogen yields dynamically stable symbioses. We show that nitrogen limitation is sufficient to stabilize the interaction through the interplay of intraspecific (symbiont-symbiont) and interspecific (host-symbiont) competition. As host assimilation of inorganic nitrogen increases, the system shifts from being stabilized by intraspecific competition between symbionts to interspecific competition between host and symbionts, necessitating a positive coupling of symbiont density to host nitrogen assimilation via photosynthate translocation for dynamic stability.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jordan A. Gault, Nils Rädecker, Iliana B. Baums, Thilo Gross. 2026-09-29. Nutrient Competition as a General Mechanism of Regulation in Photosymbiosis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37826

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Gene genealogies in diploid populations evolving according to sweepstakes reproduction

Recruitment dynamics, or the distribution of the number of offspring among individuals, is central for understanding ecology and evolution.~\breyta{Sweepstakes reproduction (when the offspring number distribution has a heavy right-tail) may characterize the recruitment dynamics of highly fecund natural populations. Sweepstakes reproduction can induce jumps in type frequencies, and multiple mergers in gene genealogies of sampled gene copies. Here, we consider gene genealogies in diploid panmictic populations evolving in a random environment. The heavy-tailed offspring number distribution is generated by mechanisms not involving natural selection, such as in chance matching of broadcast spawning with favourable environmental conditions. Our model of sweepstakes reproduction extends the one considered by Schweinsberg (2003) by applying an upper bound to the number of potential offspring of any given parent pair. Depending on the stated bound, the gene genealogies are in the domain of attraction of the Kingman coalescent, or specific familes of continuous-time Beta- or Poisson-Dirichlet simultaneous multiple-merger coalescents. The gene genealogies in a large population are viewed on a timescale proportional to at least N/log (N) generations; N is proportional to the population size (when constant). Incorporating deterministic population size changes leads to time-changed coalescents; the time-change is independent of the skewness of the offspring-number distribution. Using simulations, we show that gene genealogies in finite populations are not well approximated by the coalescent trees. Simulation results also indicate that quenched (conditioned on the population ancestry) and annealed gene genealogies in finite populations are not in good agreement whenever the skewness of the offspring number distribution is increased.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Stochastic gradient descent on the epigenetic landscape: a unified framework for cellular plasticity, tumor heterogeneity, and the asymptotic irrelevance of fitness

Phenotypic plasticity, the ability of cells to switch between states, is central to development, differentiation, and therapy resistance. Although it is modeled at several scales, from compartmental ODEs to phenotype-structured PDEs and single-cell stochastic equations, a framework connecting these descriptions is missing. We present such a framework. Starting from a general $n$-compartment ODE model encompassing nonlinear growth and linear transitions between phenotypes, we show, with a new, elementary and generalizable proof of a recent theorem, that under uniform competition, the long-term population distribution is solely governed by transition rates. All phenotypes become selectively neutral at saturation, and the imprint of fitness differences during growth fades at an explicit rate. Restricting transitions to neighboring states transforms the model into a discretization of a phenotype-structured reaction-diffusion-advection PDE. In this continuum model, diffusion and advection are identified from switching rates, and fitness remains asymptotically irrelevant. Interpreting the advection velocity as the negative gradient of an effective epigenetic potential transforms the PDE into a Fokker--Planck equation and converts single-cell trajectories into stochastic gradient descent (SGD) in the Langevin sense on the phenotypic landscape. Non-local transitions, such as mutations, are incorporated via an integro-differential term, yielding a unified model with reaction, gradient flow, diffusion, and jumps. State-dependent noise reshapes the effective landscape without altering the underlying potential. This gives cancer a route to elevated plasticity that static, single-cell snapshots cannot distinguish from a changed landscape. This framework provides a physical interpretation of Waddington's landscape, where cells perform SGD, and cancer corresponds to a corrupted landscape.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Boids of a Feather Flock Together - Evolving Prey Behaviours Under Different Predator Attack Strategies

Flocking and schooling are thought to have evolved partly as defences against predation, but how prey should balance social and escape tendencies may depend on the predator's hunting strategy. We extend the predator-prey boids model of Ojo et al. (2023), itself based on Reynolds' boids, by combining six prey movement tendencies (alignment, cohesion, separation, dodge, repel and wiggle) into a single weighted acceleration update, and by reformulating wiggle as a sinusoidal manoeuvre. We then use an evolutionary strategy to optimise the six behaviour coefficients for collective prey survival against four predator hunting strategies: attack-centroid, attack-nearest, attack-random and attack-peripheral. Across five independent trials per strategy, coefficients converged within trials and mean fitness remained stable or increased, although trials often settled in different local optima. Prey survival was highest under attack-centroid and lowest under attack-nearest, in line with our hypotheses. Against attack-centroid, prey evolved individualistic predator avoidance with high escape coefficients, whereas against the other three strategies they largely kept their flock formation. Across all strategies, evolution favoured a low repel coefficient and relatively high dodge and wiggle coefficients. Our results suggest that optimal anti-predator behaviour depends on the interplay between escape tendencies and the predator's hunting strategy.

q-bio.PE↗