Spouse-Protected Tontines: Household Decumulation via Neural-Network Optimization

Duy-Minh Dang; Yukan Perumal

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.39569

Spouse-Protected Tontines: Household Decumulation via Neural-Network Optimization

Duy-Minh Dang·Yukan Perumal

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We develop a spouse-protected tontine in which a first death changes the household state but generates no pool transfer. The same account remains attached to the household contract until extinction and funds a spouse-only continuation phase if the retiree dies first. We derive contract-level actuarial-fairness conditions and a finite-pool mortality-credit allocation rule with exact ex post budget balance. Under a homogeneous large-pool approximation, we formulate a multidimensional decumulation problem for a representative household, with withdrawal and rebalancing controls while the retiree is alive. The objective balances expected cumulative real household payments against the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of terminal shortfalls relative to household reserve targets, without conditioning on survival to the horizon. We develop a numerical solution method for this problem based on a global-in-time neural-network parameterization of admissible control policies. We quantify policy-induced spouse-continuation costs using expected-cost and risk-loaded payment-scale loads at both representative-contract and book levels. We characterize the large-book limit of average per-contract continuation cost as the expected representative-contract cost conditional on common market information. Numerical experiments calibrated to Australia show that the spouse-only phase is a first-order and persistent household event. In these experiments, book-level diversification removes most of the representative-contract excess upper-tail cost of spouse continuation in the large-book limit, without changing expected per-contract continuation cost. A cross-country mortality comparison indicates that the prevalence and persistence of the spouse-only phase are not specific to Australia.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Duy-Minh Dang, Yukan Perumal. 2026-09-30. Spouse-Protected Tontines: Household Decumulation via Neural-Network Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39569

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Large Language Model-Driven Small-Capitalization Trading: Integrating Financial News Sentiment, Macroeconomic Indicators, and Technical Signals

Large language models can extract richer signals from financial news than fixed sentiment lexicons, and recent work has explored feeding such signals into portfolio construction. We study an uncertainty-aware construction that feeds model-predicted risk -- decomposed into aleatoric and epistemic components -- directly into the covariance matrix of portfolio allocators, rather than treating portfolio risk as fixed or adjusting only expected returns. We evaluate the pipeline on Russell 2000 equities under three stock-selection regimes: a pure-alpha trigger that isolates abnormal stock moves not explained by macro indicators, a pure-beta trigger that captures macro-indicator moves before the stock itself fires, and a beta trigger in which both channels agree. Across the full holding-period grid, the separated pure-alpha and pure-beta legs usually dominate the beta intersection on Sharpe and return. Two horizons are especially informative. At one day, pure beta can work under low and moderate transaction costs because it captures immediate lead-lag spillovers from liquid macro and sector indicators into exposed small-cap stocks, but this advantage disappears at 100 bps when turnover and microstructure noise dominate. At 40 days, pure beta works for a different reason: slower macro repricing overtakes the firm-specific pure-alpha channel. The strongest conservative row is pure beta with GPT-4o mini sentiment, a Student-t target, a 40-day holding period, and risk parity allocation, reaching Sharpe 2.33 at 100 bps. The results suggest that stock-selection regime and allocator choice matter at least as much as the sentiment model, and that separating firm-specific and macro-exposure triggers is more informative than requiring both to fire simultaneously.

q-fin.PM↗

arXiv2026

Portfolio Choice with Competing Precautionary and Accumulation Goals

We study optimal portfolio choice for a household managing two goals at once. A random-deadline precautionary goal, such as a medical emergency, must be paid in full whenever it arrives and is affordable; a fixed-deadline accumulation goal, such as a target retirement lifestyle, may be declined at its deadline. We show that precautionary saving crowds out growth-oriented investment, and deadline pressure is amplified by the competing precautionary claim. We characterize the value function as the unique viscosity solution of an HJB equation, and derive the household's optimal terminal funding rule. The household funds the fixed-deadline goal exactly when the direct benefit at least offsets the resulting drop in the value of keeping the precautionary goal funded. We calibrate the model and find that both flexibility and fungibility are most valuable at intermediate wealth. Committing in advance to fund a goal sacrifices flexibility, while managing each goal in its own account sacrifices fungibility.

q-fin.PM↗

arXiv2026

Taming the Greeks: Option Portfolios with Inductive Biases

We present an end-to-end deep learning framework for systematic options trading that directly embeds hedging behavior through explicit control of portfolio-level risk exposures. While neural networks trained to optimize risk-adjusted performance have been shown to outperform traditional rules-based strategies, such approaches remain agnostic to the sensitivities of the resulting portfolios with respect to specific underlying risk factors. We propose a general training objective that combines a performance-driven loss with a differentiable risk-sensitivity penalty, enforcing neutrality to selected risk dimensions. Unlike reinforcement learning methods that approximate optimal hedging policies via simulated market dynamics, our framework operates entirely on historical data and jointly optimizes risk-adjusted returns and targeted risk constraints in a single learning problem. We instantiate the framework on static delta-neutral straddle portfolios with the penalty directed at first-order directional exposure, and evaluate two penalty variants -- an exposure-normalized penalty and a Greek-ratio drift penalty. Empirical results on Nasdaq 100 equity options demonstrate that appropriately calibrated regularization simultaneously improves out-of-sample risk-adjusted performance relative to an unregularized baseline while reducing realized directional exposure.

q-fin.PM↗