Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.39656

Testing Induced-Subgraph Freeness in Outerplanar Graphs under the Random-Neighbor Oracle

Abstract

We prove that, for every fixed nonempty graph $H$, induced-$H$-freeness is testable with $\varepsilon^{-O_H(1)}$ queries on outerplanar graphs with no maximum-degree bound in the $\textit{random-neighbor model}$, where each query at a vertex returns a uniformly random neighbor. Thus, the query complexity is polynomial in $1/\varepsilon$ and independent of the number $n$ of vertices. Previously, the best bound known for this problem was the $\operatorname{poly}(\log n)$-query guarantee that follows from the general outerplanar-graph tester of Babu, Khoury, and Newman (2016) in the stronger $\textit{adjacency-list model}$, which provides exact degree queries and indexed access to neighbors. Our tester has $\textit{two-sided error}$, which is necessary in general: induced-$P_3$-freeness has no one-sided constant-query tester in the random-neighbor model, even on outerplanar graphs of maximum degree two.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pan Peng, Kefan Yu. 2026-09-30. Testing Induced-Subgraph Freeness in Outerplanar Graphs under the Random-Neighbor Oracle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39656

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Online Matching and Contention Resolution for Edge Arrivals with Vanishing Probabilities

We study the performance of sequential contention resolution and matching algorithms on random graphs with vanishing edge probabilities. When the edges of the graph are processed in an adversarially-chosen order, we derive a new OCRS that is $0.382$-selectable, attaining the "independence benchmark" from the literature under the vanishing edge probabilities assumption. Complementary to this positive result, we show that no OCRS can be more than $0.390$-selectable, significantly improving upon the upper bound of $0.428$ from the literature. We also derive negative results that are specialized to bipartite graphs or subfamilies of OCRSs. Meanwhile, when the edges of the graph are processed in a uniformly random order, we show that the simple greedy contention resolution scheme which accepts all active and feasible edges is $1/2$-selectable. This result is tight due to a known upper bound. We then show that when the algorithm can choose the processing order, a slight tweak to the random order---give each vertex a random priority and process edges in lexicographic order---results in a strictly better contention resolution scheme that is $1-\ln(2-1/e)\approx0.510$-selectable. Moreover, we show that this bound is tight over any sequential contention resolution scheme, even one which may adaptively choose the order in which it processes edges. This provides a separation from the $0.544$ upper bound for offline contention resolution implied by the classic result of Karp and Sipser. Our positive results also apply to online matching on $1$-uniform random graphs with vanishing (non-identical) edge probabilities, extending and unifying some results from the random graphs literature.

cs.DS↗

Counting large patterns in degenerate graphs

The problem of subgraph counting asks for the number of occurrences of a pattern graph $H$ as a subgraph of a host graph $G$ and is known to be computationally challenging: it is $\#W[1]$-hard even when $H$ is restricted to simple structures such as cliques or paths. Curticapean and Marx (FOCS'14) show that if the graph $H$ has vertex cover number $τ$, subgraph counting has time complexity $O(|H|^{2^{O(τ)}} |G|^{τ+ O(1)})$. This raises the question of whether this upper bound can be improved for input graphs $G$ from a restricted family of graphs. Earlier work by Eppstein~(IPL'94) shows that this is indeed possible, by proving that when $G$ is a $d$-degenerate graph and $H$ is a biclique of arbitrary size, subgraph counting has time complexity $O(d 3^{d/3} |G|)$. We show that if the input is restricted to $d$-degenerate graphs, the upper bound of Curticapean and Marx can be improved for a family of graphs $H$ that includes all bicliques and satisfies a property we call $(c,d)$-locatable. Importantly, our algorithm's running time only has a polynomial dependence on the size of~$H$. A key feature of $(c,d)$-locatable graphs $H$ is that they admit a vertex cover of size at most $cd$. We further characterize $(1,d)$-locatable graphs, for which our algorithms achieve a linear running time dependence on $|G|$, and we establish a lower bound showing that counting graphs which are barely not $(1,d)$-locatable is already $\#\text{W}[1]$-hard. We note that the restriction to $d$-degenerate graphs has been a fruitful line of research leading to two very general results (FOCS'21, SODA'25) and this creates the impression that we largely understand the complexity of counting substructures in degenerate graphs. However, all aforementioned results have an exponential dependency on the size of the pattern graph $H$.

cs.DS↗

Budget-Independent Influence Maximization in Nearly Linear Time

Influence maximization asks for $k$ seed vertices that maximize the expected spread of a diffusion process in a network. Standard near-optimal-time algorithms based on reverse-reachable sampling achieve a $(1-1/e-\varepsilon)$ approximation, but their expected running-time bounds grow linearly with the seed budget $k$. We remove this multiplicative dependence: for the independent cascade model, our algorithm succeeds with probability at least $1-δ$ in $O((m+n)\varepsilon^{-3}\log(2n/δ))$ expected time. The result extends to triggering models with explicitly charged local sampling costs. We reserve $O(\varepsilon k)$ seed positions for cost-weighted random vertices, allowing reverse-reachable searches to stop as soon as they encounter a reserved seed. An independent sample-count estimation phase uses a statistic that also controls the expected search cost. Matching these quantities eliminates the multiplicative dependence on $k$ while preserving the approximation guarantee.

cs.DS↗