When Reasoning Helps Action: Monitoring and Steering Chain-of-Thought in Vision-Language-Action Policies

Sathwik Karnik; Joseph JR. Lee; Aryaman Gupta; Somil Bansal

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.00601

When Reasoning Helps Action: Monitoring and Steering Chain-of-Thought in Vision-Language-Action Policies

Sathwik Karnik·Joseph JR. Lee·Aryaman Gupta·Somil Bansal

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Reasoning-enabled VLA policies expose chain-of-thought (CoT) traces that appear to explain and guide their actions, creating a potential interface for runtime safety through reasoning monitoring and correction. In this work, we define and operationalize two evaluation axes for assessing when this interface can improve embodied behavior: correctability, which measures whether unreliable reasoning can be detected and improved during generation, and actionability, which measures whether reasoning corrections produce behaviorally meaningful changes in the intended direction. To enable correctability, we introduce Token-level Reward for Utility-Steered Chain-of-Thought (TRUST), an offline-trained value model that predicts eventual reasoning correctness from partial prefixes and uses these estimates to monitor and selectively steer reasoning generation in frozen VLA policies. On the Alpamayo 1.5 driving VLA, TRUST monitors correctness with 88.9% accuracy and improves reasoning correctness from 75.9% to 90.0%. On a baseline-defined challenging subset in AlpaSim, TRUST reduces collision rate by 30.4% and maximum trajectory error by 11.5% relative to the unsteered policy, outperforming a compute-matched Best-of-4 baseline. On the DeepThinkVLA manipulation VLA, TRUST improves the correctness of grasp-state claims from 69.3% to 90.2% and action-choice claims from 68.8% to 85.9%, yet closed-loop task performance on LIBERO-Plus remains largely unchanged. Empirical analysis reveals intent-consistent behavioral effects in Alpamayo 1.5 but limited effects in DeepThinkVLA, helping interpret these different task-level outcomes. Together, our results show that gains in reasoning correctness do not automatically imply gains in embodied performance, motivating evaluation of correctability and actionability when using CoT as a runtime safety interface.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Sathwik Karnik, Joseph JR. Lee, Aryaman Gupta, Somil Bansal. 2026-09-30. When Reasoning Helps Action: Monitoring and Steering Chain-of-Thought in Vision-Language-Action Policies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00601

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Easier Said Than Done: Unpacking Intent-Behavior Gap in Jailbreaking LLM-Based Robots

LLM-based robots use Large Language Models (LLMs) as planners to translate natural language instructions into policies such as grasp(), move_to(), and open_gripper(). Jailbreak attacks on these robots extend the threat from generating malicious content to executing harmful behaviors. However, we find that existing jailbreak attempts against LLM-based robots that produce malicious-looking policies (intent jailbreaks) often fail to induce harmful physical actions by robots (behavior jailbreaks), due to robot-specific constraints, such as logical errors and hallucinated control APIs. In this paper, we demystify the intent-behavior gap and investigate its root causes to inform effective defenses. Our measurement study finds that current LLM jailbreak methods overlook robot-specific syntax constraints (e.g., executable control APIs) and physical feasibility (e.g., ordering of policies and hardware/kinematic constraints). To bridge the gap, we introduce POEF (POlicy EFfective Jailbreak), an automated red-teaming framework that takes into account the robot-specific constraints during both the optimization and evaluation processes. Specifically, POEF employs the hidden-layer gradients from an unaligned LLM to guide the jailbreak prompt optimization and uses a multi-agent evaluator to assess the feasibility of the generated policies. Experiments on commercial robots, including the Unitree G1, the Franka robotic arm, and simulators, show that POEF achieves an 80% behavior jailbreak success rate and transfers across various LLMs. In addition, we propose two defense strategies that mitigate the behavior jailbreak risks. Our findings indicate an urgent need for stronger countermeasures before LLM-based robots are deployed at scale. The homepage is available at https://zjushine.github.io/poef.github.io/.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

UrbanVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Urban Micromobility

Urban micromobility applications, such as delivery robots, demand reliable navigation across large-scale urban environments while following long-horizon route instructions. This task is particularly challenging due to the dynamic and unstructured nature of real-world city areas, yet most existing navigation methods remain tailored to short-scale and controllable scenarios. Effective urban micromobility requires two complementary levels of navigation skills: low-level capabilities such as point-goal reaching and obstacle avoidance, and high-level capabilities, such as route-visual alignment. To this end, we propose UrbanVLA, a route-conditioned Vision-Language-Action (VLA) framework designed for scalable urban navigation. Our method explicitly aligns noisy route waypoints with visual observations during execution, and subsequently plans trajectories to drive the robot. To enable UrbanVLA to master both levels of navigation, we employ a two-stage training pipeline. The process begins with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) using simulated environments and trajectories parsed from web videos. This is followed by Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) on a mixture of simulation and real-world data, which enhances the model's safety and adaptability in real-world settings. Experiments demonstrate that UrbanVLA surpasses strong baselines by more than 55% in the SocialNav task on MetaUrban. Furthermore, UrbanVLA achieves reliable real-world navigation, showcasing both scalability to large-scale urban environments and robustness against real-world uncertainties.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

SlotVLA: Towards Modeling of Object-Relation Representations in Robotic Manipulation

Inspired by how humans reason over discrete objects and their relationships, we explore whether compact object-centric and object-relation representations can form a foundation for multitask robotic manipulation. Most existing robotic multitask models rely on dense embeddings that entangle both object and background cues, raising concerns about both efficiency and interpretability. In contrast, we study object-relation-centric representations as a pathway to more structured, efficient, and explainable visuomotor control. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we introduce LIBERO+, a fine-grained benchmark dataset designed to enable and evaluate object-relation reasoning in robotic manipulation. Unlike prior datasets, LIBERO+ provides object-centric annotations that enrich demonstrations with box- and mask-level labels as well as instance-level temporal tracking, supporting compact and interpretable visuomotor representations. Second, we propose SlotVLA, a slot-attention-based framework that captures both objects and their relations for action decoding. It uses a slot-based visual tokenizer to maintain consistent temporal object representations, a relation-centric decoder to produce task-relevant embeddings, and an LLM-driven module that translates these embeddings into executable actions. Experiments on LIBERO+ demonstrate that object-centric slot and object-relation slot representations drastically reduce the number of required visual tokens, while providing competitive generalization. Together, LIBERO+ and SlotVLA provide a compact, interpretable, and effective foundation for advancing object-relation-centric robotic manipulation.

cs.RO↗