Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.03057

When Does Synthetic Relational Data Teach Models to Use Relations? Tracing Predictive Structure from Pretraining Data to Model Behavior

Shivam Dubey·Mohamed Bouadi·Nassim Bouarour·Varun Kulkarni·Aditya Tanna·Vinay Kumar Sankarapu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Relational foundation models are increasingly pretrained on synthetic databases, yet downstream benchmarks reveal little about why one synthetic corpus produces a better model than another. In particular, strong performance may arise from realistic row-level statistics without the model ever learning to use relational structure. We study this as a data-attribution problem: which property of synthetic pretraining data induces relational computation? Using four Relational Transformer checkpoints trained with the same architecture, initialization, objective, and compute budget on corpora produced by four relational data generators, we trace a measurable property of the data to learned computation and downstream behavior. We hypothesize that relational mechanisms emerge when cross-table information is predictively necessary for the masked-cell pretraining objective. RelDiff exhibits by far the largest predictive gain from foreign-key-linked parents, and its corresponding model is uniquely sensitive to foreign-key interventions on unseen databases. This dependence survives a random-initialization control, grows monotonically with the fraction of corrupted links, and localizes to a serial cross-table pathway. Finally, disrupting the same mechanism during downstream inference removes RelDiff's advantage on relational tasks while leaving structure-insensitive models nearly unchanged. These results connect a property of synthetic training data to a learned mechanism and, through intervention, to downstream behavior.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shivam Dubey, Mohamed Bouadi, Nassim Bouarour, Varun Kulkarni, Aditya Tanna, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu. 2026-10-02. When Does Synthetic Relational Data Teach Models to Use Relations? Tracing Predictive Structure from Pretraining Data to Model Behavior. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03057

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Robust Adversarial Quantification via Conflict-Aware Evidential Deep Learning

Reliability of deep learning models is critical for deployment in high-stakes applications, where out-of-distribution or adversarial inputs may lead to detrimental outcomes. Evidential Deep Learning, an efficient paradigm for uncertainty quantification, models predictions as Dirichlet distributions of a single forward pass. However, EDL is particularly vulnerable to adversarially perturbed inputs, making overconfident errors. Conflict-aware Evidential Deep Learning~\mbox{(C-EDL)} is a lightweight post-hoc uncertainty quantification approach that mitigates these issues, enhancing adversarial and OOD robustness without retraining. C-EDL generates diverse, task-preserving transformations per input and quantifies representational disagreement to calibrate uncertainty estimates when needed. C-EDL's conflict-aware prediction adjustment improves detection of OOD and adversarial inputs, maintaining high in-distribution accuracy and low computational overhead. Our experimental evaluation shows that C-EDL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art EDL variants and competitive baselines, achieving substantial reductions in coverage for OOD data (up to $\approx55\%$) and adversarial data (up to $\approx90\%$), across a range of datasets, attack types, and uncertainty metrics.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Differential Privacy as a Perk: Federated Learning over Multiple-Access Fading Channels with a Multi-Antenna Base Station

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning paradigm that preserves privacy by eliminating the need to exchange raw data during training. In its prototypical edge instantiation with underlying wireless transmissions enabled by analog over-the-air computing (AirComp), referred to as \emph{over-the-air FL (AirFL)}, the inherent channel noise plays a unique role of \emph{frenemy} in the sense that it degrades training due to noisy global aggregation while providing a natural source of randomness for privacy-preserving mechanisms, formally quantified by \emph{differential privacy (DP)}. It remains, nevertheless, challenging to effectively harness such channel impairments, as prior arts, under assumptions of either simple channel models or restricted types of loss functions, mostly considering (local) DP enhancement with a single-round or non-convergent bound on privacy loss. In this paper, we study AirFL over multiple-access fading channels with a multi-antenna base station (BS) subject to user-level DP requirements. Despite a recent study, which claimed in similar settings that artificial noise (AN) must be injected to ensure DP in general, we demonstrate, on the contrary, that DP can be gained as a \emph{perk} even \emph{without} employing any AN. Specifically, we derive a novel bound on DP that converges under general bounded-domain assumptions on model parameters, along with a convergence bound with general smooth and non-convex loss functions. Next, we optimize over receive beamforming and power allocations to characterize the optimal convergence-privacy trade-offs, which also reveal explicit conditions in which DP is achievable without compromising training. Finally, our theoretical findings are validated by extensive numerical results.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying LLM-as-a-Judge: Analytically Tractable Model for Inference-Time Scaling

Recent developments in large language models have shown advantages in reallocating a notable share of computational resource from training time to inference time. However, the principles behind inference time scaling are not well understood. In this paper, we introduce an analytically tractable model of inference-time scaling: Bayesian linear regression with a reward-weighted sampler, where the reward is determined from a linear model, modeling LLM-as-a-judge scenario. We study this problem in the high-dimensional regime, where the deterministic equivalents dictate a closed-form expression for the posterior predictive mean and variance. We analyze the generalization error when training data are sampled from a teacher model. We draw $k$ inference-time samples and select via softmax at a temperature applied to a quadratic reward. When the reward is not too different from the teacher, the generalization error decreases monotonically with increasing inference time samples $k$. However, the specific reward that optimizes inference-time selection generally differs from the teacher. In contrast, substantial reward misspecification induces a finite optimal $k$ beyond which more sampling can increase the generalization error. For fixed $k$, there exists an optimal sampling temperature. We experimentally verify these facts in large language model inference with an additional large language model as a judge. In the "best-of-$k$" limit with the teacher as reward, we theoretically show that the generalization error decays as $Θ(1/k^2)$ and determine the leading coefficient via extreme value theory. These formulas delineate domains where scaling inference-time computation is provably preferable to collecting more data. Finally, we demonstrate that when task difficulty increases, the previously mentioned advantage of inference-time compute degrades.

cs.LG↗