Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.03131

A note on partitioning the vertex set of a graph into a dominating set and a locating dominating set

Abstract

A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex not in $S$ has a neighbor in $S$, where two vertices are neighbors if they are adjacent. The domination number, $γ(G)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality among all dominating sets of $G$. Given a set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$, two vertices are located by $S$ if they have distinct sets of neighbors in $S$. Moreover, if $S$ locates every pair of vertices not in $S$, then it is called a locating set of $G$. A locating dominating set of $G$ is both a dominating and a locating set of $G$. The locating domination number, $γ^{\rm LD}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality among all locating dominating sets of $G$. A notable conjecture in the study of locating dominating sets is to show that the locating domination number of an isolate-free and twin-free graph of order $n$ is at most $\frac{1}{2}n$. So far, the best approximation to this upper bound conjecture is known to be $\left \lceil \frac{5}{8}n \right \rceil$. Much in line with the conjecture, an even stronger reformulation proposed in the literature asks if it is possible to partition the vertex set of an isolate-free and twin-free graph into two locating sets. However, such partitions into locating sets may not exist if the graph is also allowed to have twins. Continuing with this line of research, we show that if $G$ is an isolate-free (and not necessarily twin-free) graph, then the vertex set of $G$ can be partitioned into a dominating set and a locating dominating set. As a consequence, we infer that every isolate-free graph $G$ of order $n$ satisfies $γ(G) + γ^{\rm LD}(G) \le n$, and we show that the last bound is tight. Moreover, our proof of the existence of a partition of the vertex set of an isolate-free graph into a dominating and a locating dominating set also provides a polynomial-time algorithm to construct such a partition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dipayan Chakraborty, Florent Foucaud, Michael A. Henning, Tero Laihonen. 2026-10-02. A note on partitioning the vertex set of a graph into a dominating set and a locating dominating set. https://doi.org/10.37236/14049

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Symmetries of the q-deformed real projective line

We generalize in two steps the quantized action of the modular group on q-deformed real numbers introduced by Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko. First, we let the projective general linear group PGL(2,Z) act on q-real numbers via a q-deformed action. The deformed matrices we get have combinatorial interpretations, and we show that their traces are palindromic polynomials. Then we consider an extension of the group PGL(2,Z) by the 2-elements cyclic group, and define a deformed action of this extension on q-real numbers. We deduce from these actions some underlying relations between q-real numbers, and between left and right versions of q-deformed rational numbers. In particular we investigate the case of some algebraic numbers of degree 4 and 6. We also prove that the deformation of real numbers is an injective process.

math.CO↗

Combinatorial Games and the Golden Ratio on Digraphs

We introduce a new combinatorial game called Triangle Game. In this game, a directed $3$-cycle graph is given, and stones are placed on each vertex. The player chooses a directed edge and takes at least one stone from the initial vertex. At the same time, the player is allowed to return some stones to the terminal vertex of the edge, as long as the total number of stones decreases. We describe the set of \Pps~under both normal play and misère play. The golden ratio $ϕ=\dfrac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ plays an essential role in our description. We also show that Triangle Game is tame.

math.CO↗

Coloopless zonotopes and counterexamples to the Shifted Lonely Runner Conjecture

Henze and Malikiosis (2017) have shown that the Lonely Runner Conjecture (LRC) can be restated as a convex-geometric question on the so-called LR zonotopes, lattice zonotopes with one more generator than their dimension. This relation naturally suggests a more general statement, the shifted LRC, the zonotopal version of which concerns a classical parameter, the covering radius. In this paper we do two things: 1) We show explicit counterexamples to both the shifted Lonely Runner Conjecture (starting at $n=5$) and to the Lonely Vector Property of Malikiosis-Schymura-Santos (2025). 2) We push the analogies between the two versions of LRC and their zonotopal counterparts, in particular highlighting that the proofs of the finite-checking Theorems A and B in Malikiosis-Schymura-Santos (2025) are more transparent, and the statements more general, if regarded in terms of two quite general classes of lattice zonotopes: the coloopless zonotopes that we introduce here and the cosimple ones, already defined by them.

math.CO↗