Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.03149

Learning While Inferring: Local and Parallel Learning for Edge SNNs across Sensing Modalities

Abstract

Edge intelligence requires models to sense continuously in real time and to keep adapting on-device, all under tight compute, energy, and memory budgets. Although spiking neural networks (SNNs) enable efficient event-driven inference, standard surrogate-gradient backpropagation (BP) serializes updates and blocks ongoing inference. We investigate Bidirectional Spike-Based Distillation (BSD) as an on-device learning principle that lets edge SNNs learn while inferring. BSD couples a stimulus-driven forward network with an independent target-driven reverse network and aligns their intermediate representations through local objectives. Because the two pathways have disjoint computation graphs until alignment, forward inference, reverse inference, and stage-wise updates can run concurrently. On 25 benchmarks spanning the five sensing modalities of SOUL, BSD stays within 3.8 percentage points of matched BP baselines on average, while only its forward branch is needed at deployment. The learned representations also transfer well to few-shot class-incremental learning without replaying past data. By removing the dense floating-point backward chain, BSD reduces the projected training latency to $0.72\times$ and the estimated training energy to $0.36\times$ that of BP.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yanxun Zhang, Yifei Wang, Changze Lv, Jingwen Xu, Yiyang Lu, Xiaohua Wang, Di Yu, Xin Du, Xiaoqing Zheng. 2026-10-02. Learning While Inferring: Local and Parallel Learning for Edge SNNs across Sensing Modalities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03149

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Flexible and Generic Approach for Explainable Landscape Analysis and the pyXla Toolbox

Landscape analysis has been successfully applied to understand complex optimisation problems, gain insights into algorithm behaviour, and automate algorithm selection and configuration. Although many landscape analysis techniques have been developed over the last decades, it remains difficult for researchers and practitioners to decide which approaches are appropriate and to implement them in practice. Some tools are available, but these are either restricted to particular problem domains (e.g., unconstrained black-box continuous optimisation), or are limited in what they model and measure. In addition, output from landscape analysis is often not easily interpretable, especially when computed landscape features do not correspond with aspects of problems that practitioners are familiar with. In this paper, we introduce a principled approach for explainable landscape analysis (XLA) with an associated Python package called pyXla. The approach is generic in that it applies to problems with different representations (continuous or combinatorial), with single or multiple objectives, with or without constraints. The extent of analysis provided by the XLA framework depends on the data available, with richer analysis offered as additional information is provided by the user. We demonstrate the explainable output produced by pyXla on a selection of hand-crafted problems with diverse landscape characteristics.

cs.NE↗

On the Influence of the Feature Computation Budget on Per-Instance Algorithm Selection for Black-Box Optimization

Per-instance algorithm selection (PIAS) takes advantage of complementarity between a set of algorithms by deciding which algorithm to run on a given instance. This decision is based on features of the instances, which, in the context of black-box optimization (BBO), require a part of the optimization budget to be computed. This raises two questions: (a) from which fraction of the budget spent on feature computation does PIAS become worth it for BBO, and (b) which fraction of the budget optimizes the tradeoff between feature accuracy and PIAS performance. To this end, we perform a broad study where PIAS with varying sampling budgets for feature computation is compared to the single best algorithm on a broad range of algorithm selection scenarios. These scenarios consist of two portfolio sizes, three problem sets, 4 dimensionalities, and 10 target budgets. We find that PIAS is viable for the majority of tested scenarios, even when as much as a quarter of the total budget is spent on feature computation. The tradeoff for the fraction of the budget spent on feature computation to maximize the benefit of PIAS is highly dependent on the specific AS scenario. Further, on average 20 percent of PIAS loss to the virtual best solver is explained by the budget spent on feature computation, highlighting the importance of properly accounting for the feature budget.

cs.NE↗

Bi-objective chance-constrained evolutionary optimization for large-scale open-pit mine scheduling under geological uncertainty

The open-pit mine scheduling problem (OPMSP) is a complex optimization problem in long-term mine planning that involves numerous operational and geological constraints. Traditional deterministic approaches often ignore geological uncertainty, leading to suboptimal or unreliable production schedules. Chance constraints provide a framework for handling uncertainty by ensuring that probabilistic constraints are satisfied with a predefined confidence level. In this paper, we consider the OPMSP under geological grade uncertainty and propose a bi-objective chance-constrained formulation that simultaneously maximizes the expected discounted net present value and minimizes scheduling risk. Unlike traditional chance-constrained approaches, the proposed formulation does not require a predefined confidence level during optimization. Instead, it generates a set of Pareto-optimal solutions representing different trade-offs between profitability and risk within a single optimization run. To solve the resulting large-scale stochastic optimization problem, we employ multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and compare their performance against a single-objective chance-constrained evolutionary approach and a deterministic MILP benchmark. We further evaluate the contribution of the problem-specific initialization and mutation components through an ablation study. Experimental results on MineLib benchmark instances containing up to 112 687 blocks demonstrate that the proposed formulation effectively captures the trade-off between profitability and risk under geological uncertainty while providing greater flexibility than confidence-level-dependent approaches.

cs.NE↗