Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.03336

Optimal allocation in combat models with multiple battlefields

Abstract

We study the allocation of a force of a fixed size across independent battlefields against a known distribution of opposing forces. Formulating battlefield outcomes through loss and survival functions allows us to establish allocation results without assuming a specific system of combat equations. For convex enemy loss functions, an optimal allocation exists with at most one partially saturated battlefield. We prove NP-hardness for every prescribed family of strictly convex, strictly increasing loss functions satisfying an endpoint normalization, and give an exact pseudopolynomial algorithm for the special case when the total force size and saturation thresholds are integers. We also derive allocation rules for maximizing successful engagements, maximizing own survivors, and maximizing the ratio of enemy losses to own losses. Applications include a power-law family containing the classical Lanchester, guerrilla, and mixed combat models, as well as models with implicitly defined outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Antonín Slavík, Vladimír Švígler. 2026-10-02. Optimal allocation in combat models with multiple battlefields. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03336

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perturbed Iterate SGD for Lipschitz Continuous Loss Functions with Numerical Error and Adaptive Step Sizes

Motivated by neural network training in finite-precision arithmetic environments, this work studies the convergence of perturbed iterate SGD using adaptive step sizes in an environment with numerical error. Considering a general stochastic Lipschitz continuous loss function, an asymptotic convergence result to a Clarke stationary point is proven as well as the non-asymptotic convergence to an approximate stationary point in expectation. It is assumed that only an approximation of the loss function's stochastic gradient can be computed, in addition to error in computing the SGD step itself.

math.OC↗

Sharp bounds in perturbed smooth optimization

This paper studies the problem of perturbed convex and smooth optimization. The main results describe how the solution and the value of the problem change if the objective function is perturbed. Examples include linear, quadratic, and smooth additive perturbations. Such problems naturally arise in statistics and machine learning, stochastic optimization, stability and robustness analysis, inverse problems, optimal control, etc. The results provide accurate expansions for the difference between the solution of the original problem and its perturbed counterpart with an explicit error term.

math.OC↗

Controllability Allocation Scores for Targeted Network Intervention

We introduce the controllability allocation score (CAS), a framework for determining how intervention intensity should be distributed among prescribed candidate input directions with respect to designated target variables, together with the target controllability score (TCS) as its nodewise specialization. We establish existence of the CASs and develop a general uniqueness theory based on restricted injectivity of the allocation-to-Gramian map, including generic uniqueness with respect to the time horizon. We show that restricting attention to target variables can fundamentally alter the optimal intervention allocation compared with the standard full-state setting. To enable scalability, we develop a general surrogate-Gramian framework and derive objective-performance guarantees from relative Gramian errors without requiring uniqueness or closeness of the CASs. For the TCS specialization, we further construct a target-only reduced virtual system and derive explicit bounds showing how the approximation error depends on the coupling between target and non-target nodes and on the dynamical growth rate. Experiments on human brain networks show that the reduced formulation accurately approximates the TCS at short horizons, whereas the two controllability criteria exhibit markedly different approximation accuracy at long horizons.

math.OC↗