Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.04439

A study on healthcare expenditure in Italian regions via Symbolic Regression

Cristina Rossetti·Nicola Caravaggio·Giovanni Lamura·Giuliano Resce
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The study of the factors driving the dynamics of healthcare spending is of paramount importance to guide policymakers in the allocation of resources and to measure the effectiveness of the healthcare system under consideration. The identification of these drivers can be supported by the use of machine learning techniques, which enable the discovery of hidden patterns within vast amounts of data. In contrast to black-box methods, Symbolic Regression (SR) is an approach that allows for the identification of analytical models that explicitly capture the functional relationships within the data, thus enhancing interpretability. In this paper, we present the use of SR for identifying the drivers of healthcare expenditure in Italian regions. Given the dynamic and complex nature of this phenomenon, we generated several models based on distinct temporal windows, enabling us to analyze the drivers across different time horizons. In addition to identifying the main drivers based on variable frequency in the generated models, we also conducted a study on recurring substructures. The results show that SR was able to generate models with a good level of predictive accuracy for private healthcare expenditure, enabling a reliable analysis of its driving factors, but failed to do so for public healthcare expenditure.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cristina Rossetti, Nicola Caravaggio, Giovanni Lamura, Giuliano Resce. 2026-10-03. A study on healthcare expenditure in Italian regions via Symbolic Regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04439

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Delphos: A reinforcement learning framework for assisting discrete choice model specification

We introduce Delphos, a deep reinforcement learning framework for assisting discrete choice model specification process. Delphos aims to support the modeller by providing automated, data-driven suggestions for model specifications, thereby reducing the effort required to develop and refine utility functions. Delphos conceptualises model specification as a sequential decision-making problem, inspired by the way human choice modellers iteratively construct models through a series of reasoned specification decisions. In this setting, an agent learns to specify candidate model specifications by choosing a sequence of modelling actions, such as adding alternative specific constants, accommodating both generic and alternative-specific taste parameters, applying non-linear transformations to attributes, and including interactions with covariates. Each resulting candidate model is estimated and evaluated using a reward function defined by the modeller, which can reflect statistical model fit as well as behavioural expectations. Specifically, Delphos uses a Deep Q-Network to learn how individual specification decisions contribute to the eventual quality of the resulting model and, in turn, which sequences of modelling decisions tend to produce well-performing candidates. We evaluate Delphos on both simulated and empirical datasets using alternative reward functions. In simulated cases, learning curves, Q-value patterns, and performance metrics show that Delphos learns effective specification strategies while exploring only a small fraction of the feasible modelling space. We further apply the framework to two empirical datasets to benchmark and demonstrate its practical use. These experiments illustrate the ability of Delphos to generate competitive, behaviourally plausible models and highlight the potential of this adaptive, learning-based framework to assist the model specification process.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Trade Liberalization and Product Innovation: The Dynamic Role of Exporting

How does trade liberalization affect firms' incentives to innovate? We answer this question using China's WTO accession and a dynamic model of firms' joint export and product-innovation decisions. We find that trade liberalization reduced iceberg trade costs by approximately 13.5 percent in the air-conditioner manufacturing industry, which substantially increased the probability of export and product innovation. Moreover, the response is driven primarily by dynamic rather than static incentives. Two dynamic mechanisms are central: exporting and innovating lead firms to predict more favorable transitions to better productivity states and reduce future entry costs, thereby raising the returns to subsequent innovation. Counterfactual decompositions show that these mechanisms account for the majority of the innovation response. For firms in an intermediate productivity state, the direct static effect (without entry-cost saving and state transition) accounts for only 9.2 percent of the total effect of WTO accession. Shutting down state transition leads to 62.4 percent of the total effect, while shutting down entry-cost saving results in 28.5 percent. The results demonstrate that the innovation effects of trade liberalization are substantially amplified by firms' endogenous dynamic responses, highlighting the importance of accounting for state transitions and forward-looking decisions when evaluating the gains from trade.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Risk Ceilings and Development Deadlines: Pacing AI under Uncertain Safety Productivity

Can a regulator promise both a risk ceiling and a development deadline when safety productivity is unknown? A ceiling below the final model's unprotected hazard requires a minimum stock of safety knowledge, so both promises hold only if weak research can be ruled out. Learning first and then replaying development, with spare compute in safety, comes close to that minimum. In a calibration with only state risk, constant safety yield, and full knowledge transfer, it needs only 3.3 percent more productivity than the necessary bound. Customer services pay for the guarantee. Rules that fix compute allocation fix dates, not risk.

econ.GN↗