Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.04592

Bounds, Decompositions and Null Behaviour of KRATOS: A Mathematical Specification of a Recognition-Comparability Diagnostic

Maria Dolores Gonzalez·Alberto Barbado
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

KRATOS is a group-structured bibliometric diagnostic that compares the distribution of documents (participation) with the distribution of citation weight (recognition) over a fixed, finite universe of analytical groups. This note gives its complete mathematical specification and derives the properties that govern its interpretation. Beyond bounds and equality conditions for each component, we show that the recognition-alignment score depends on citation data only through ratios of group mean citation rates to the corpus mean; that the composition ceiling of the participation--recognition factor is an affine function of the total variation distance to the uniform reference; and that the factor itself satisfies Fréchet-type bounds in terms of this ceiling and a participation-weighted recognition score. We establish an exact logarithmic decomposition of the composite index, an ordering between the primary and a reciprocal-symmetric recognition score, invariance properties, and closed-form first and second moments of the recognition ratios under global and stratified permutation nulls. These results explain why composite orderings can be sensitive to small groups, heavy-tailed citation distributions and metadata reassignment. All results are verified numerically with an accompanying script. The specification concerns measurement structure only; it does not define a measure of epistemic change or justice.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria Dolores Gonzalez, Alberto Barbado. 2026-10-03. Bounds, Decompositions and Null Behaviour of KRATOS: A Mathematical Specification of a Recognition-Comparability Diagnostic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04592

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

When Explanations Compete: Policy-Aware Selection Under Uncertainty

Uncertainty-aware explanation methods often produce several alternatives for the same prediction. Selecting among them requires a policy for balancing prediction confidence, uncertainty, and application constraints. This paper presents a framework for applying such policies to a fixed set of generated explanations. Candidates are characterised by uncertainty change, prediction direction, and, when available, interval position relative to a decision boundary. The framework combines these properties with eligibility rules, optional bidirectional Pareto screening, and policy-aware ranking. A fictitious prostate-cancer example illustrates how different explanatory purposes lead to different selections from the same candidate set. We instantiate the framework with Calibrated Explanations for classification, thresholded regression, and plain regression. Across 41 benchmark datasets, mean candidate counts range from 11.57 to 21.75 for single-feature explanations and from $29.48$ to $69.53$ when conjunctions are included. Equal-weight and confidence-only policies yield an average selection-disagreement rate of $28.7\%$ while favouring the same confidence direction. A supporting $δ$-CLUE experiment demonstrates use with a second generator. By making the selection policy explicit, the framework allows applications to compare and prioritise explanations according to their intended use.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

DrugMCTS: a drug repurposing framework combining multi-agent, RAG and Monte Carlo Tree Search

Recent advances in large language models have demonstrated considerable potential in scientific domains such as drug repositioning. However, their effectiveness remains constrained when reasoning extends beyond the knowledge acquired during pretraining. Conventional approaches, such as fine-tuning or retrieval-augmented generation, face limitations in either imposing high computational overhead or failing to fully exploit structured scientific data. To overcome these challenges, we propose DrugMCTS, a novel framework that synergistically integrates RAG, multi-agent collaboration, and Monte Carlo Tree Search for drug repositioning. The framework employs five specialized agents tasked with retrieving and analyzing molecular and protein information, thereby enabling structured and iterative reasoning. Extensive experiments on the DrugBank and KIBA datasets demonstrate that DrugMCTS achieves substantially higher recall and robustness compared to both general-purpose LLMs and deep learning baselines. Our results highlight the importance of structured reasoning, agent-based collaboration, and feedback-driven search mechanisms in advancing LLM applications for drug repositioning.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

PuzzleJAX: A Benchmark for Reasoning and Learning

We introduce PuzzleJAX, a GPU-accelerated puzzle game engine and description language designed to support rapid benchmarking of tree search, reinforcement learning, and LLM reasoning abilities. Unlike existing GPU-accelerated learning environments that provide hard-coded implementations of fixed sets of games, PuzzleJAX allows dynamic compilation of any game expressible in its domain-specific language (DSL). This DSL follows PuzzleScript, which is a popular and accessible online game engine for designing puzzle games. In this paper, we validate in PuzzleJAX several hundred of the thousands of games designed in PuzzleScript by both professional designers and casual creators since its release in 2013, thereby demonstrating PuzzleJAX's coverage of an expansive, expressive, and human-relevant space of tasks. By analyzing the performance of search, learning, and language models on these games, we show that PuzzleJAX can naturally express tasks that are both simple and intuitive to understand, yet often deeply challenging to master, requiring a combination of control, planning, and high-level insight.

cs.AI↗