Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.04597

Efficient Quantum State Identity Testing

Abstract

We study the following quantum state identity problem: given access to copies of $n$ unknown pure quantum states, the goal is to determine whether every pair has fidelity at least $1-\varepsilon$ or some pair has fidelity at most $\varepsilon$. This problem relaxes the identical-or-orthogonal promise considered in previous work. For any fixed overlap parameter $\varepsilon\in(0,1/4)$, we present two quantum algorithms with complementary guarantees on circuit depth and sample complexity. The first runs in constant depth using parallel swap tests and takes $O(\log(n/δ)\log(2/δ))$ copies of each input state to succeed with probability at least $1-δ$. The second uses the Schur transform to reduce the sample complexity to $O(\log(n/δ))$, through an analysis relating Jucys--Murphy elements to Schur sampling. We also prove a matching sample complexity lower bound of $Ω(\log(n/δ))$ for any quantum algorithm with failure probability at most $δ\le 1/2-c$, for any constant $c>0$, establishing that the second algorithm achieves the optimal dependence on both $n$ and $δ$ for fixed $\varepsilon$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shih-Han Hung, Ming-Hsien Tsai. 2026-10-03. Efficient Quantum State Identity Testing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04597

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quantum probability for statisticians; some new ideas

It is argued from several points of view that quantum probabilities might play a role in statistical settings. New approaches toward quantum foundations have postulates that appear to be equally valid in macroscopic settings. One such approach is described here in detail, while one other is briefly sketched. In particular, arguments behind the Born rule, which gives the basis for quantum probabilities, are given. A list of ideas for possible statistical applications of quantum probabilities is provided and discussed. A particular area is machine learning, where there exists substantial literature on links to quantum probability. Here, an idea about model reduction is sketched and is motivated from a quantum probability model. Quantum models can play a role in model reduction, where the partial least squares regression model is a special case. It is shown that for certain experiments, a Bayesian prior given by a quantum probability can be motivated. Quantum decision theory is an emerging discipline that can be motivated by this author's theory of quantum foundations.

quant-ph↗

Black hole/quantum machine learning correspondence

We explore a possible connection between the black hole information paradox and interpolation geometry underlying the double descent phenomenon in quantum machine learning. State-dependent operator reconstruction on the Hawking radiation can be formulated as a quantum linear inverse problem defined on the black hole-radiation purification. In this picture, the Page time corresponds to the interpolation threshold, where the dimensions of the remaining black hole and the radiation become comparable. Using the Marchenko-Pastur law, we study the spectrum of the corresponding Gram matrices and obtain the variance of the linear reconstruction coefficients. The Page point is then related to both a change in the rank structure of the two subsystems and a strong enhancement of the coefficient variance near the interpolation threshold. This suggests a possible relation between the Page transition and interpolation phenomena in quantum machine learning.

quant-ph↗

Intersubjective Agreement about Measurement Outcomes Is Unnecessary in QBism

The thought experiment called ``Wigner's Friend" has experienced a renewal of interest for interrogating the meaning of intersubjectivity and objectivity in quantum mechanics. These new inquiries extend to investigations at the intersection of phenomenology and QBism. Philosopher of physics Steven French argues that QBism does not give assurances that Wigner and friend must agree on the same quantum state or measurement outcomes. In this article, we draw on Wigner's Friend to argue that an external guarantee for agreement on either quantum states or measurement outcomes is unnecessary. We defend the view that the quantum formalism is already inherently intersubjective in the way required to sustain objectivity. Here we explore the QBist notion of reciprocity, which treats Wigner and friend as physical systems taking mutual actions on each other. The QBist notion of reciprocity leads to a sharper characterization of what it means to objectify quantum systems with the formalism. Drawing on phenomenological resources, we argue that state assignments for quantum systems, including those for Wigner and friend, are a form of objectification. To assign a quantum state is to objectify a phenomenon as a quantum system, to treat something as the sort of object to which the formalism applies. Our argument accounts for why the quantum formalism does not radically change in application for different systems because the systems themselves exceed their formalization.

quant-ph↗