From Access to Realized Affordances: University Students' Generative AI Engagement across Linguistic and Sociotechnical Contexts

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly embedded in university students' academic work, yet student engagement is often examined through adoption, frequency of use, or general perceptions, with less attention to how it is shaped by linguistic and sociotechnical conditions. This comparative qualitative study examines how university students access, incorporate, and evaluate GenAI across three contrasting higher education settings in China, Japan, and Mongolia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 42 undergraduates from one university in each setting, and the data were analyzed through qualitative interpretation supported by co-occurrence network and correspondence analyses using KH Coder. Across the three samples, GenAI was incorporated into academic practices spanning exploration, production, and refinement. However, access pathways differed across the three contexts. Participants in China navigated between domestic and global GenAIs, those in Japan predominantly used global GenAIs through Japanese, and those in Mongolia more frequently shifted to English when Mongolian outputs were perceived as less satisfactory. During their use of GenAI, students evaluated its accuracy, privacy implications, potential for dependence, and effects on critical thinking. The findings suggest that technological access alone does not ensure equivalent educational usability across linguistic and sociotechnical contexts. Building on the empirical findings and the analytical perspectives, an empirically informed integrative framework is developed in which student GenAI engagement is understood as situated, mediated, enacted, and evaluated. The framework conceptualizes realized affordances as educational possibilities that become practically usable through the interplay of sociotechnical conditions, linguistic resources, academic practices, and evaluative judgments.