Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.05629

Does the AI Productivity Dividend Diminish? Does the AI Productivity Dividend Diminish? A Validated Framework for Identifying the Shape of Firm-Level Returns to Artificial Intelligence

Louis Agyekum
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Forecasts of the productivity dividend from artificial intelligence (AI) differ by an order of magnitude, partly because they extrapolate average gains observed among early, highly exposed adopters. Whether those gains scale linearly, flatten, or are competed away is an empirical question about the shape of the return to AI, not its average. This paper develops and validates a design-based framework for measuring that shape with linked firm-worker data. The framework combines a pre-determined, occupation-based measure of firm exposure to generative AI with a continuous-treatment difference-in-differences design around the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, three pre-specified tests of concavity, a decomposition of exposure effects into an adoption margin and a per-adopter return, a doubly robust analysis of use intensity, a staggered-adoption analysis of earlier AI adopters, and a production-function estimator that places AI in the law of motion of productivity. We validate every component on a calibrated synthetic panel of 20,000 enterprises that reproduces the structure of Statistics Canada's linked business microdata and embeds a known concave effect. The estimators recover the true dose-response curve and detect its concavity (slope difference -0.010, standard error 0.003, one-sided p = 0.002); Monte Carlo coverage of the main confidence interval is 0.97, and the concavity test has power of 0.93. The validation also exposes a practical pitfall: pre-trend tests clustered at roughly 40 industries over-reject a true null. The framework, released as open code, is ready for application to Canadian enterprise microdata, where it will inform estimates of potential output and the persistence of Canada's productivity gap.

Explore related subjects

stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Louis Agyekum. 2026-10-04. Does the AI Productivity Dividend Diminish? Does the AI Productivity Dividend Diminish? A Validated Framework for Identifying the Shape of Firm-Level Returns to Artificial Intelligence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05629

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Walking Fingerprinting Using Wrist Accelerometry During Activities of Daily Living in NHANES

We propose a method for identifying individuals based on their continuously monitored wrist-worn accelerometry during activities of daily living. The method consists of three steps: (1) using Adaptive Empirical Pattern Transformation (ADEPT), a highly specific method to identify walking; (2) transforming the accelerometry time series into an image that corresponds to the joint distribution of the time series and its lags; and (3) using the resulting images to construct a person-specific walking fingerprint. The method is applied to 15,000 individuals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with up to 7 days of wrist accelerometry data collected at 80 Hertz. The resulting dataset contains more than 10 terabytes, is roughly 2 to 3 orders of magnitude larger than previous datasets used for activity recognition, is collected in the free living environment, and does not contain labels for walking periods. Using extensive cross-validation studies, we show that our method is highly predictive and can be successfully extended to a large, heterogeneous sample representative of the U.S. population: in the highest-performing model, the correct participant is in the top 1% of predictions 96% of the time.

stat.AP↗
arXiv2026

Stable Multivariate Functional Time Series Prediction for Major Geomagnetic Indices

High-resolution scientific data, such as geomagnetic index streams, often exhibit complex temporal dependencies that can be modeled through functional data analysis. Conventional functional time series (FTS) methods typically partition continuous processes into non-overlapping segments, which artificially fragments temporal continuity and can limit estimation efficiency and stability. This is particularly evident in geomagnetic time series prediction due to their noisy, sudden, and large-scale changes. This study presents a robust multivariate FTS forecasting framework for multi-dimensional time series with inter-series correlations and the existence of exogenous predictors. We introduce an overlapping rolling-window scheme that preserves temporal coherence and mitigates boundary information loss, thereby enriching the effective sample size for a more efficient and stable estimation. We integrate functional principal component analysis for dimension reduction with a vector autoregressive model with exogenous inputs to capture latent dynamics across correlated series. We also construct computationally efficient conformal prediction intervals for uncertainty quantification. The framework is motivated by and applied to the simultaneous forecasting of five critical geomagnetic indices, Kp, Dst, SYM-H, SME, and SMR, using solar wind parameters as predictors. Empirical results show that this approach outperforms state-of-the-art machine learning baselines, extends forecast horizons to 6-24 hours, and provides calibrated uncertainty bounds.

stat.AP↗
arXiv2026

Second-Order Response Laws for LLM Judges: Debiased Estimation of Prompt Instability

LLM judges are often evaluated with a single prompt and only a few repeated calls. When their verdicts vary, it remains unclear whether the variation comes from sampling noise within a prompt or systematic differences across prompts. We formalize this distinction using a second-order response law: the distribution of prompt-conditioned verdict distributions induced by a declared prompt policy. For a quadratic measure of prompt instability, we show that the usual plug-in estimator is biased upward at finite repeat budgets because it confounds within-prompt noise with between-prompt variation. We derive unbiased estimators for both sampled prompts and declared fixed prompt censuses from the difference between within- and across-prompt agreement. Under a crossed prompt-by-answer-order design, the same framework separates prompt, order, interaction, and residual call variation, while retaining invalid completed outputs as outcomes. Known-law simulations and a byte-identical live null recover the predicted finite-$R$ inflation. In a matched Qwen study, corrected low-repeat estimates are closer to an independently acquired $R=16$ reference than plug-in estimates, with the largest gains at small repeat budgets. A matched panel across four frozen judge configurations exhibits configuration-specific inflation magnitudes and component profiles. Prompt robustness can therefore be estimated separately from finite-call noise.

stat.AP↗