Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.06720

Interplay between Excitability and Noise in Analog Spiking Neurons

Léopold Van Brandt·Alon Ascoli·Michele Bonnin·Grégoire Brandsteert·Denis Flandre·Jean-Charles Delvenne
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A spiking neuron is a dynamical system exhibiting a limit cycle (a spike) when subject to sufficiently excitatory input. Famous neuroscience experiments by Bryant and Segundo as well as Mainen and Sejnowski revealed that the spike times of some biological neurons are more reliable when subject to time-varying stimuli compared to constant ones. Provided with an industrial physics-based transient noise SPICE simulation framework compatible with foundry transistor compact models, we have demonstrated similar behaviours for a CMOS analog spiking neuron designed for neuromorphic computing hardware platforms. Under constant excitation current, the neuron operates in oscillatory regime and the empirical periods (interspike intervals) suffer from accumulated phase noise (jitter) during successive cycles, mainly due to the thermal noise of transistors. A time-varying input is reported to be capable of triggering output spikes according to a controlled statetransition mechanism, thereby significantly reducing the spike time jitter in the excitability regime. The physical limitation of the oscillatory or rate-coding regime in terms of reliabilitydissipation tradeoff is further evidenced by a stochastic thermodynamic uncertainty relation, a theorem that applies to general overdamped dissipative stochastic dynamical systems.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NCcond-mat.stat-mechcs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Léopold Van Brandt, Alon Ascoli, Michele Bonnin, Grégoire Brandsteert, Denis Flandre, Jean-Charles Delvenne. 2026-10-05. Interplay between Excitability and Noise in Analog Spiking Neurons. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06720

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Neural networks as decision trees: an analytical solution for learning and neural selectivity

Nonlinear neural networks develop structured internal representations, yet how their geometry is determined by the tasks being learned remains poorly understood. Here, we develop an analytical framework for piecewise-linear feedforward and recurrent networks that links learning, activation-region structure, and neural selectivity. We show that, at any stationary point of gradient-aligned learning, a nonlinear network decomposes into local linear regressions over its activation regions. Deviations from the corresponding least-squares solutions are jointly constrained by network weights shared across regions and vanish in the low-error regime, yielding an approximate piecewise least-squares decomposition of the task. This structure admits a decision-tree interpretation, which we recover numerically by fitting trees to predict network activation patterns from the input. We further derive how the regions in which neurons are active determine the task statistics they capture, thereby organizing neural selectivity into distinct subpopulations. The resulting predictions closely match the selectivity geometry observed in simulated networks and two empirical neural datasets. Finally, we show that neural baseline regulates activation pattern diversity, placing networks along a continuum between coarse, generalizing representations and fine-grained, expressive representations. Together, these results establish activation regions as a unifying framework for describing how nonlinear networks decompose task structure into local computations and how those computations can be revealed through neural activity.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

A Time-Resolved Framework for Quantifying Neuronal Network State Transitions

Electrophysiological recordings provide powerful tools for characterizing the dynamics of neuronal networks. In vitro neuronal cultures offer a controlled setting for investigating network responses to diverse interventions, including pharmacological and optogenetic stimulation. However, conventional analyses often reduce electrophysiological activity to aggregate measures calculated over fixed temporal windows, providing only a static representation of the network state. Here, we introduce a comprehensive, multiparametric analytical framework designed to characterize both the temporal evolution of network activity and the transitional states induced by external interventions. The framework combines multiple network discriminators with a compositional analysis that resolves electrode-level responses into excited, inhibited, and unchanged states over successive temporal segments. We apply the framework to electrophysiological recordings obtained under pharmacological interventions with 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), optogenetic stimulation, and additional benchmark conditions. The results demonstrate that the proposed analysis can reveal subtle and transient responses that may be difficult to detect using conventional aggregate measures, including responses to low-dose pharmacological interventions. These findings highlight the value of temporally resolved and compositional analyses for characterizing heterogeneous neuronal network responses in vitro.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Dynamical incompatibilities in paced finger tapping experiments

Paced finger-tapping tasks are used to probe the error correction mechanism underlying sensorimotor synchronization. Despite their century-long history, fundamental contradictions persist in the literature. One such contradiction arises when comparing the two most common types of period perturbation: step change and phase shift. The stimulus sequence is exactly the same up to and including the (unexpected) perturbed stimulus. Why then would the timing of the next response be different between perturbation types, as observed? We show, both experimentally and theoretically, that responses to both types of perturbation are dynamically incompatible when recorded in separate experiments; that is, they cannot be described by a single underlying dynamical system due to the build-up of different temporal contexts. In contrast, when both types of perturbation are presented randomly within the same experiment, the responses become compatible and can be explained by a single mechanism. We conclude that a single underlying dynamical system can represent the response to all perturbation types, signs, and sizes, which is nevertheless calibrated by temporal context. Our results challenge the established idea of phase and period correction processes that are separately activated for different perturbation types.

q-bio.NC↗