Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.06947

FactorBench: A Portfolio-Aware Benchmark for Automated Factor Mining

Zhuohan Wang·Carmine Ventre
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Factor mining seeks to discover signals from financial data that predict future asset returns and guide portfolio construction. Automated factor mining now spans genetic programming, reinforcement learning, generative models, and large language model agents. Yet it remains unclear whether advances across these paradigms yield more generalizable, distinct, and economically useful financial signals. We introduce FactorBench, a portfolio-aware benchmark comparing roughly five thousand mined factors from nine automated mining methods across five equity markets. A shared data and evaluation contract supports both symbolic expressions and executable Python factors, connecting heterogeneous discovery algorithms to common signal combination and portfolio construction procedures. FactorBench traces the outputs of mining systems across three levels: factor validity, temporal generalization, and predictiveness beyond measured risk and style exposures; within- and across-method pool distinctness, including similarity to the benchmark Alpha101; and composite-signal quality and after-cost long-only and long--short portfolio performance. After systematically assessing whether advances in factor mining translate into signal quality and portfolio performance, FactorBench finds that no paradigm consistently dominates.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PMcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhuohan Wang, Carmine Ventre. 2026-10-03. FactorBench: A Portfolio-Aware Benchmark for Automated Factor Mining. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06947

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Exponential investors with weakly mean-reverting prices

We investigate a continuous-time financial market where the asset price exhibits weak (sublinear) mean reversion and has a nonzero drift. Complementing earlier work on strong (superlinear) mean reversion, we show that, for an investor maximizing expected exponential utility, the certainty equivalent grows as $O(T^{2β+1})$ where $0<β<1$ is the strength of mean reversion. An explicit asymptotically optimal strategy is also given.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Robust enhanced index tracking portfolio selection under distributional uncertainty

The enhanced index tracking (EIT) portfolio selection problem aims to construct a portfolio that is expected to outperform a benchmark index. In practice, investors face uncertainty in the joint distribution of asset and index losses, as the true distribution is typically unknown and only partial information is available. Moreover, portfolio selection requires balancing the trade-off between mean loss and downside risk while targeting higher returns. Effectively modeling and managing these factors in EIT portfolio selection is therefore of both practical and research interest. To address these challenges, this paper proposes robust EIT portfolio selection models under distributional uncertainty, guided by Pareto-optimality theory. The models minimize a convex combination of worst-case mean loss and downside risk, subject to a constraint on worst-case mean return. Two uncertainty sets are considered: one assuming a known mean loss vector and covariance matrix, and a more general set with unknown moments. Closed-form solutions are derived for the former, while the latter reduces to tractable convex optimization problems. Empirical results based on real market data show that the proposed models outperform not only the tracked index but also the equally weighted portfolio, robust mean-variance models, and robust variance models in terms of out-of-sample cumulative wealth, as well as Sharpe, Sortino, and Omega ratios. Moreover, portfolios that minimize a convex combination of worst-case mean loss and downside risk consistently outperform those that minimize downside risk alone. We also provide practical guidance for selecting optimal weighting coefficients to effectively balance risk and return.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Constrained portfolio optimization in a life-cycle model: A deep pricing kernel approach

This paper considers the constrained portfolio optimization in a generalized life-cycle model. The individual with a stochastic income manages a portfolio consisting of stocks, a bond, and life insurance to maximize their consumption level, death benefit, and terminal wealth. Meanwhile, the individual faces a convex-set trading constraint, with the non-tradeable asset constraint, no short-selling constraint, and no borrowing constraint as special cases. We build the artificial markets to solve this problem by manipulating the compensated drift terms of the underlying assets to meet the trading constraints. By dual transform, we propose a deep pricing kernel approach to compute tight lower and upper bounds for the primal problem, which can be used when the value function lacks an explicit solution due to the pricing kernel's conditional expectation. Finally, we conclude that when considering the trading constraints, the individual will reduce their consumption, demand for life insurance and annuities, and wealth levels due to the restricted market.

q-fin.PM↗