Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.08170

Visual Orchestration Tax in Agentic VLM Pipelines: Auditing and Certifying Visual Evidence Reuse

Abstract

Agentic VLM pipelines increasingly pass the same static visual evidence through multiple specialist agents and tools. This design creates an orchestration-level redundancy mode: semantically unchanged images are repeatedly reconstructed as image-conditioned requests at the VLM API boundary. We call this phenomenon visual orchestration tax and develop a measurement-to-certification framework for visual evidence reuse in agentic VLM pipelines. The audit side defines $\mathrm{M1}_{\mathrm{trace}}$ to count raw visual-evidence touches and M2 to measure structural touch redundancy, with query-level distributions, bootstrap confidence intervals, and paired quality tests. Across SeeingEye and MAMMQA on chart, document, general-VQA, and multi-modal-QA tasks, audits reveal 66.8-75.6% visual-evidence touch redundancy, and every audited query exceeds the predefined gate. The certification side introduces SharedVisCache, a contract-aware evidence reuse hook keyed by image content, preprocessing fingerprint, and encoder assumptions. On SeeingEye, contract validation certifies 75.0-75.5% repeated touches as reusable while preserving 350/350 output strings and $Δ\mathrm{M5}{=}0$. At the physical layer, certified hits reduce $F_{\mathrm{vision}}$ from 800 to 200 in ChartQA-200 trace replay and from 200 to 50 inside live SeeingEye translator-stage physical integration, preserving 800/800 replay strings and 200/200 integrated call outputs. The results position visual reuse as a measurable, behavior-preserving property of agent orchestration and define an agent-layer contract that makes backend prefix or token reuse semantically interpretable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lingteng Zeng. 2026-10-06. Visual Orchestration Tax in Agentic VLM Pipelines: Auditing and Certifying Visual Evidence Reuse. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08170

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Forward-Deployed Full-Stack Engineering for Autonomous Cloud MLOps

Across industries, machine-learning systems support applications ranging from prediction and anomaly detection to forecasting, optimization, and scheduling, yet operationalizing these systems requires coordinating application development, model pipelines, cloud infrastructure, security, deployment, monitoring, retraining, recovery, and rollback. We present an evidence-gated multi-agent framework for transforming a natural-language MLOps cloud engineering task into a verified repository and operational cloud deployment. The framework combines graph engineering, loop engineering, and agent harness engineering. A stateful Graph Orchestrator coordinates specialized agents for repository generation, review, execution, verification, release, and monitoring while governing workflow dependencies, evidence gates, retry bounds, recovery paths, and termination. Consequential lifecycle transitions proceed only when their required predicates are supported by verifiable execution or runtime evidence. Verification failures activate bounded reflection, repair, and re-verification, while runtime evidence of failure, drift, degradation, or policy violation can trigger bounded adaptation, recovery, or rollback. Agent harness engineering constrains repository generation, review, and repair, artifact execution, and cloud operations through controlled capabilities and isolated execution environments. We realize the framework on Google Cloud Platform and evaluate repository completeness, controlled execution, evidence-gated transitions, cloud promotion, and bounded recovery. Our experimental results show that the framework prevents unsupported lifecycle transitions and drives each run toward either a verified operational deployment or an auditable terminal failure.

cs.MA↗

Loop-Back Authority in LLM Agent Teams: A Paired Experiment on Flat and Hierarchical Coordination

Does authority in AI teams improve the outcome? Organizational theory asserts that authority facilitates decision making, improving quality. Meanwhile, some nascent AI research suggests that revision under authority makes LLM output worse. Multi-agent LLM frameworks default to giving a Manager agent the authority to send a worker's output back for revision. Prior comparisons test the effect of authority using verifiable tasks. We conduct an experiment on an open-ended task, business-intelligence reporting, using a sample of 43 paired laptop products and 86 runs. Each report is written once by a hierarchical team and once by a flat team. We find that flat teams produce higher-quality reports, scoring higher on Utility (d = 0.42, p = 0.009) and Writing Clarity (d = 0.34, p = 0.030). The reports are the same length, but hierarchical team reports use 53% more hedging words such as "may" and "could", and each revision is associated with a 0.14-point drop in Writing Clarity on a 1 to 5 scale. Before any revision, the hierarchical team's first draft is indistinguishable from the flat team's report. In other words, the quality gap can be traced to revision. Authority improves quality when the Manager can verify the work, else when it can only provide feedback it has a negative effect on quality.

cs.MA↗

Absorbing State Phase Transitions in Multi-Agent Search

Nontrivial dynamics can emerge in large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems, and preliminary evidence exists that formalisms from statistical mechanics can be effective at modeling and predicting such behaviors. In parallel, designing multi-agent communication topology for optimal task-solving is an active research question. In this paper, we focus on predicting the success of multi-agent search tasks using the formalism of absorbing state phase transitions. We first taxonomize search tasks into four types, informed by classical results in combinatorial search. We then theoretically derive a critical communication degree $d_c$, the minimum number of agents each agent can communicate with, above which incorrect hypotheses do not proliferate uncontrollably and the search enters the solved state. Finally, we evaluate frontier LLM-based multi-agent systems on real-world search and discovery tasks, software configuration debugging and physical mechanism discovery, and find that agreement with theory is mixed. LLM agents may not communicate with their neighbors and can develop strategies that are individually beneficial but limits the benefits of collaboration.

cs.MA↗