Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.08821

Two-Regime Risk Measures under Convex Loss

Abstract

We study a two-regime summary of a real-valued loss distribution. The two representative levels and the boundary between them are chosen by minimizing a convex residual loss. When the distribution has an atom at the boundary, assigning that atom to the lower or upper regime can give different optimized costs. Taking the better whole-atom assignment yields the lower-semicontinuous cutoff profile. We prove epi-convergence of this profile under a loss-adapted \(ψ\)-weak topology and obtain convergence of minimum values and outer stability of optimal cutoff sets. Under a unique finite atom-free limiting cutoff, positive regime masses, and unique conditional centers, the two fitted levels and a canonical one-jump representation converge as well. We also examine the resulting summary from the viewpoint of monetary risk axioms, establish explicit failures of external monotonicity and subadditivity, and give finite-support algorithms with conditional error control. A four-scenario model illustrates the cutoff geometry and the role of ties and atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mihaela-Adriana Nistor, Ionel Popescu. 2026-09-24. Two-Regime Risk Measures under Convex Loss. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Functional Representation of Credit Behavior for Probability of Default Modeling

This paper proposes a framework for modeling probability of default via functional data analysis. By representing a series of credit variables as functions, we investigate whether intra-monthly information improves default predictability in linear models. We further show how a range of widely used variables, among them available funds, utilization rate, and overdraft, can all be derived from three quantities observed over time. Namely, 1) the type of each account, 2) the balance of the account, and 3) the size of the credit limit on the account. Retaining these quantities as continuous-time processes, rather than reducing them to monthly aggregated values, yields a continuous faithful representation of the borrower. When analyzing these three processes, we discovered that recurring events associated with the ordinal position among banking days created strong cyclical patterns. We therefore develop a relative time framework that aligns the recurring events across borrowers, ensuring that borrowers possess the same cyclical pattern, regardless of real time. We assess the framework using functional logistic regression. This approach accommodates the continuous representation while remaining closely related to a logistic regression model commonly used in credit risk practice, due to strict regulatory constraints. We show that, when equipped with an effective functional representation of transactional trajectories, the proposed model attains predictive performance on par with XGBoost while consistently outperforming logistic regression. Importantly, the model balances predictive performance of a machine learning model with the interpretability of linear default models, potentially enabling financial institutions to use the model, even under strict regulation.

q-fin.RM↗

Rating criteria, risk measures, and risk consistency

Categorical ratings are widely used by investors to screen financial products, such as defaultable securities and investment funds. We model rating criteria as discrete transforms of risk measures, and introduce and study several natural notions of risk consistency that promote prudent investment decisions. Three closely related notions of risk consistency are considered: with respect to risk aversion, the asset pooling effect, and the benefit of portfolio diversification. These notions can be formulated under multiple probability measures. For both the monetary and positive homogeneous (MPH) and state-dependent expected utility (SEU) classes, we show how these properties translate between rating criteria and their corresponding risk measures, and establish a hierarchical structure among the properties. These findings lead to full characterizations for the Choquet subclass of MPH criteria and for SEU criteria. Illustrated by case studies on collateralized loan obligations and investment funds, some classes of risk-consistent scenario-based criteria can serve as useful alternatives to the probability of default and expected loss criteria used in practice for rating financial products.

q-fin.RM↗

Risk Measures for the Climate Transition Age: Why Symmetric Risk Budgets are unlikely to mitigate two-dimensionally asymmetric Climate Change risks

The most widely used investment risk measures - variance, standard deviation, and tracking error - treat upside deviations as equally undesirable as downside losses. In stable markets with assumed symmetric return distributions, this simplification is potentially harmless. In the climate transition age, it is not. Climate risk is two-dimensionally asymmetric, across assets and over time. Both dimensions are negatively skewed against investors. Hence, climate transition investment strategies deliberately deviate from benchmarks that reflect an insufficiently decarbonising global economy. When fiduciaries enforce tracking error budgets that penalise outperformance just as heavily as underperformance, they inadvertently constrain exactly the portfolio return opportunities that climate-aware investing seeks. We argue that replacing symmetric deviation-based risk measures with their downside-only counterparts - semi-variance, standard risk and trailing error - resolves this conflict without sacrificing any fiduciary discipline. The distinction is not merely semantic: as the gap between climate transition trajectories and market benchmarks widens over the coming decades, symmetric risk budgets will become binding constraints on transition strategies well before actual investment risk warrants it. We propose specific changes to mandate design that would allow institutional investors to pursue climate transition opportunities within genuinely risk-aware (rather than deviation-averse) frameworks.

q-fin.RM↗