Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.09176

A family of Hurwitz polynomial vector fields in $\mathbb{R}^3$ having non-constant periodic orbits

Abstract

We construct a two-parameter family of polynomial vector fields in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and prove that, on a nonempty open set of parameter values, every member of the family is Hurwitz and possesses two non-constant periodic orbits, one of saddle type and one attracting. This answers Problem 19 in Gasull's list of open problems on low-dimensional dynamical systems concerning the existence of non-constant periodic orbits in Hurwitz smooth vector fields on $\mathbb{R}^3$. This also provides counterexamples to the expected non-existence of non-constant periodic orbits for Hurwitz polynomial vector fields; a question that arose from the first counterexamples to the Markus-Yamabe conjecture in the late 1990s and that was stated by Meisters in his featured MathSciNet review of the Bernat-Llibre counterexample.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Álvaro Castañeda, Salomón Rebollo-Perdomo. 2026-10-06. A family of Hurwitz polynomial vector fields in $\mathbb{R}^3$ having non-constant periodic orbits. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09176

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Survivor Set of Gauss Map with a Hole at $1$

Let $T$ be the Gauss map. For each $α\in [0,1]$, let $E(α)$ be the survivor set consisting of all $x\in [0,1]$ whose orbit $\{T^k(x):k\ge 0\}$ never enters the interval $(α,1]$. We prove that the set-valued function $α\mapsto E(α)$ is increasing and locally constant almost everywhere. Moreover, we explicitly characterize all intervals where the function $α\mapsto E(α)$ remains constant. We also describe the points at which the map $α\mapsto E(α)$ is not locally constant. Further, we obtain the Hausdorff dimension of $E(α)$ for all $α\in [0,1]$. We prove that the function $α\mapsto \dim_H(E(α))$ forms a devil's staircase on $(0,1]$, but is not continuous at $0$. This discontinuity implies that the result of Raith [Acta Math. Univ. Comenian. 63 (1994), 39-53] fails for piecewise monotone interval maps with infinitely many branches. Finally, we give an application quantifying the set of points sharing identical $α$-continued fraction expansion and regular continued fraction expansion.

math.DS↗

Decomposition results for multiplicative actions and applications

Motivated by partition regularity problems of homogeneous quadratic equations, we prove multiple recurrence and convergence results for multiplicative measure preserving actions with iterates given by rational sequences involving polynomials that factor into products of linear forms in two variables. We focus mainly on actions that are finitely generated, and the key tool in our analysis is a decomposition result for any bounded measurable function into a sum of two components, one that mimics concentration properties of pretentious multiplicative functions and another that mimics vanishing properties of aperiodic multiplicative functions. Crucial to part of our arguments are some new seminorms that are defined by a mixture of addition and multiplication of the iterates of the action, and we prove an inverse theorem that explicitly characterizes the factor that these seminorms naturally determine.

math.DS↗

Shadowing in CR-Dynamical Systems

A CR-dynamical system is a pair $(X, G)$, where $X$ is a compact metric space and $G$ is a closed relation on $X$. We introduce four $(i,j)$-shadowing properties, obtained by independently varying the quantifiers in the definitions of pseudo-orbit and shadowing. These properties coincide with the classical shadowing property for single-valued systems, while $(2, 2)$-shadowing agrees with the established notion of shadowing for set-valued dynamical systems. We investigate how the classical characterisations of shadowing for the identity map, periodic maps and isometries extend to closed relations. In particular, we obtain rigidity results for $(2, 1)$-shadowing and positive results for $(1, 2)$-shadowing on totally disconnected spaces. Finally, whenever the infinite Mahavier product is non-empty, we prove that a closed relation has the $(2, 2)$-shadowing property if, and only if, its associated Mahavier dynamical system has the shadowing property. This removes the surjectivity hypothesis from a recent corresponding result for set-valued dynamical systems.

math.DS↗