Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.11078

Condensed Whitehead Problem

Abstract

The Whitehead problem, which asks whether every abelian group $A$ satisfying $\mathrm{Ext}^1(A,\mathbb{Z}) = 0$ is free, is independent of ZFC. However, this problem has an analogue in condensed mathematics that can be answered affirmatively. In this note, we give a new proof that an abelian group $ A $ of size $κ$ is free if and only if $\underline{\mathrm{Ext}}^1(\underline{A}, \underline{\mathbb{Z}})(S_κ) = 0$, where $ S_κ$ is the Stone space of the Boolean completion of $\operatorname{Add}(ω,κ)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Spencer Unger, Jerry Wei. 2026-10-08. Condensed Whitehead Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11078

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Complexity of deep computations via topology of function spaces

We use topological methods to study complexity of deep computations and limit computations. We use topology of function spaces, specifically, the classification of Rosenthal compacta, to identify new complexity classes. We use the language of model theory, specifically, the concept of \emph{independence} from Shelah's classification theory, to translate between topology and computation. We use the theory of Rosenthal compacta to characterize approximablility of deep computations, both deterministically and probabilistically.

math.LO↗

Points and their multiples on curves in powers of simple abelian varieties

Let $G$ be a simple abelian variety of dimension $g \in \mathbb{N}$ defined over $\mathbb{Q}^\mathrm{alg}$ and let $C_1, C_2 \subseteq G^N(\mathbb{C})$ be irreducible closed algebraic curves with $N \geq 3$. Further assume that at least one of $C_1$ and $C_2$ is not defined over $\mathbb{Q}^\mathrm{alg}$. Suppose that there does not exist an algebraic subgroup $H_1 \subseteq G^N(\mathbb{C})$ of dimension $g$ such that $C_1 \subseteq H_1$ and that there does not exist an algebraic subgroup $H_2 \subseteq G^N(\mathbb{C})$ of dimension $2g$ such that $C_1 \cup C_2 \subseteq H_2$. Denoting $\mathcal{N} = \{n \in \mathbb{N} \ | \ [n]C_1 \subseteq C_2\}$, we prove that $\bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N} \setminus \mathcal{N}}\{x \in C_1 \ | \ nx \in C_2\}$ is finite.

math.LO↗

Measuring the complexity of characterizing $[0, 1]$, $S^1$, and $\mathbb{R}$ up to homeomorphism

In analogy to the study of Scott rank/complexity of countable structures, we initiate the study of the Wadge degrees of the set of homeomorphic copies of topological spaces. One can view our results as saying that the classical characterizations of $[0,1]$ (e.g., as the unique continuum with exactly two non-cut points, and other similar characterizations), appropriated expressed, are the simplest possible characterizations of $[0,1]$. Formally, we show that the set of homeomorphic copies of $[0,1]$ is $\mathbfΠ^0_4$-Wadge-complete. We also show that the set of homeomorphic copies of $S^1$ is $\mathbfΠ^0_4$-Wadge-complete. On the other hand, we show that the set of homeomorphic copies of $\mathbb{R}$ is $\mathbfΠ^1_1$-Wadge-complete. It is the local compactness that cannot be expressed in a Borel way; the set of homeomorphic copies of $\mathbb{R}$ is $\mathbfΠ^0_4$-Wadge-complete within the locally compact spaces.

math.LO↗