Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.11146

What Transfers from Training-Only Priors? Separating Knowledge, Ordinal Targets, and Optimization

Qiye Lu·Jiang Ji·Liang Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Training-only teacher access lets a compact student deploy with local features and exported weights. This established distillation interface does not identify what transfers or when it helps. We separate label, query, capacity, and source-access budgets on three public credit archives and a previously unexamined bankruptcy archive. Shared tree parameters, shuffles, and optimizer interventions expose limitations of historical Ranking Prior Alignment; no tested single repair consistently rescues it. Heldout source queries and matched warmup and mappings retain a rank-listwise advantage over mapped staged KD in 24 credit configuration means and all six teacher--capacity means of a frozen new-archive test, with explicit query failures and stronger source-weight delivery under a different interface. A pretrained TabICLv2 follow-up at 100 labels initially improves matched supervision in only one of eight means; six of nine source-predicted policy gains reverse on target. A registered seen-archive intervention adds 500 or 2,000 unlabeled queries: all eight matched AUC means become positive under selected and fixed alpha. However, outer effects are mixed and no conditional paired-draw interval for these supervised contrasts lies wholly above zero. Increasing teacher context at 500 student labels does not beat matched supervision in any of eight ordinary-context means, despite stronger direct teacher performance. Rank KD retains substantial probability errors. Independent reloads verify zero guarded external inference accesses. Results support query/context boundary diagnostics, without universal superiority, population significance, a prospective transfer rule, or an LLM-specific advantage.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Qiye Lu, Jiang Ji, Liang Zhang. 2026-10-23. What Transfers from Training-Only Priors? Separating Knowledge, Ordinal Targets, and Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11146

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗