Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.12779

Game Petri Nets: Compositional Modeling and Analysis of Large-Scale Strategic Systems

Abstract

Large-scale strategic systems, such as maintenance workflows, cyber campaigns, and multi-agent AI pipelines, consist of many interactions whose outcomes determine which later interactions become possible, who takes part, and with what resources. We introduce game Petri nets, formalized as outcome-driven compositional game Petri nets (OCGPNs), to model and analyze such systems. Local games are attached to places of a colored Petri net, and a game-to-token interface converts each resolved game into typed tokens that enable, synchronize, or block subsequent games. For general, concurrent nets, we give an operational semantics and a structural theory based on invariants and Farkas certificates, which shows that guards can certify unreachability whereas incentive instruments can only change values. For sequential nets, the net induces a stochastic game on its game places. We prove that global equilibria are exactly collections of equilibria of local games augmented by continuation values, characterize through successor-level pivotality when downstream games change upstream behavior, and compute values place by place via a decomposition into strongly connected components, at a cost additive in local game sizes. A composition calculus based on place fusion glues certificates across subnets and summarizes downstream subnets by their entry values. Two running examples, a maintenance workflow and an intrusion campaign derived from multi-resolution cyber-defense games, illustrate the theory, including the composition of a newly discovered attack scenario with an existing campaign.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Quanyan Zhu. 2026-10-08. Game Petri Nets: Compositional Modeling and Analysis of Large-Scale Strategic Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12779

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Infinite lexicographic products of positional objectives

This paper contributes to the study of positional determinacy of infinite duration games played on potentially infinite graphs with neutral transitions. Recently, [Ohlmann, TheoretiCS 2023] established that positionality of prefix-independent objectives is preserved by finite lexicographic products. We propose two different notions of infinite lexicographic products indexed by arbitrary ordinals, and extend Ohlmann's result by proving that they also preserve positionality. In the context of one-player positionality, this extends positional determinacy results of [Grädel and Walukiewicz, Logical Methods in Computer Science 2006] to edge-labelled games and arbitrarily many priorities for both Max-Parity and Min-Parity. Moreover, we show that the Max-Parity objectives over countable ordinals are complete for the infinite levels of the difference hierarchy over $Σ^0_2$ and that Min-Parity is complete for the class $Σ^0_3$. We obtain therefore positional languages that are complete for all those levels, as well as new insights about closure under unions and neutral letters.

cs.GT↗

Effective Horizons for Prophet Inequalities with Discounted I.I.D. Rewards

We study prophet inequalities for $n$ i.i.d. base rewards subject to multiplicative discounts across $S$ phases. For equal-length phases and a common discount factor $\widetildeγ$, we characterize the optimal competitive ratio of single-quantile policies as $n\to\infty$ with $S$ and $\widetildeγ$ fixed. The resulting sharp guarantee describes the dependence on the phase parameters: it recovers $1-1/e$ without discounting and approaches $1/2$ in the worst-case regime. We also establish a distribution-free comparison that bounds the discounted prophet by a fractional i.i.d. maximum with effective horizon $B$, the sum of the discount weights across all observations. The comparison yields acceptance probability $1/B$, determined only by the phase profile. This calibration attains the canonical optimum even among single-quantile policies that may choose their acceptance probability using the known base distribution. The comparison also gives guarantees for heterogeneous discounts and unequal phase lengths. A complementary optimal-stopping upper bound establishes the same limiting optimum of $1/2$ for arbitrary stopping rules in the canonical model. Finally, the same effective-horizon calibration sets acceptance probability $1-\widetildeγ$ under infinite-horizon geometric discounting. This explicit quantile rule attains Boshuizen's (1994) known optimal worst-case ratio $1/(1+\widetildeγ)$ without solving a Bellman equation.

cs.GT↗

Fair Selection of Generalized Nash Equilibria: A Comparability Perspective

Generalized Nash equilibrium (GNE) problems model self-interested agents coupled through their costs and shared constraints, and arise throughout control applications that allocate a scarce common resource. Such problems typically admit a continuum of equilibria, so any implementation must \emph{select} one. This selection is not neutral: it decides how the cost of the shared constraint is distributed among the agents, a decision often expected to be fair. The variational GNE (v-GNE), which charges all agents a uniform shadow price, is the conventional choice and is frequently advocated as fair. Through the lens of \emph{comparability} from social choice theory, we show that the GNE set itself requires no inter-agent comparability of costs, whereas the v-GNE implicitly assumes cardinal unit comparability, one of the stronger notions. We then introduce the fair GNE (f-GNE), which selects an equilibrium by explicitly optimizing a fairness metric matched to the comparability at hand, and give constructive routes to compute it for single-constraint and linear-quadratic games. An electric-vehicle charging game serves as a running example throughout this self-contained tutorial.

cs.GT↗