Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.13529

Teams without teams: a trace-based method for measuring team-like organization

Thomas Baillie-Dawe·Cécile Bothorel·Nicolas Jullien
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Digital platforms provide increasingly detailed traces of collaborative activity, yet these traces do not directly reveal whether contributions remain largely independent or whether more structured forms of collective work emerge through interaction. This paper addresses the methodological problem of measuring such organization when the collective being studied is not defined as a team in advance. We propose a trace-based method for measuring teamness, understood as the degree to which collaborative activity expresses properties associated with teamwork. The method translates established dimensions of teamwork into behavioral indicators that can be recovered from digital traces. These indicators can be examined separately and summarized through a composite measure of their joint expression. It does not require predefined team membership and is designed to be adapted across collaborative settings. We illustrate the method using revision histories from 52,437 articles in the English Wikipedia's Medicine WikiProject, comprising more than 10 million human-authored edits. Using article-months as observation units, the application shows that different dimensions of teamlike organization display distinct patterns and that their joint expression can vary within the same articles over time. The contribution is a general measurement framework for examining graded and dynamic forms of collective organization directly from behavioral traces.

Explore related subjects

cs.SI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas Baillie-Dawe, Cécile Bothorel, Nicolas Jullien. 2026-10-09. Teams without teams: a trace-based method for measuring team-like organization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13529

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Les Misérables Dialogue: A film-based network representation of social communication

In this work, we revisit the classic Les Misérables benchmark network from the perspective of social communication. Using the 1998 film adaptation of the novel, we construct the publicly available Les Misérables Dialogue temporal text network, which explicitly distinguishes speakers, addressees, and other recipients of each utterance, along with its content and timing. Using the ten social dimensions model, we also derive multilayer network representations of the network, in which layers correspond to distinct relational dimensions. Beyond the network dataset, this work offers a general methodology for building similarly rich communication datasets from similar narrative sources.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Extracting Illicit-Rich Subgraph from Transaction Networks via Feed-Guided Shortest Paths

We study investigative subgraph extraction for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) transaction graphs using the Shortest Paths Network Search Algorithm (SPNSA), which aggregates shortest paths among a small input feed of entities. Since SPNSA is highly sensitive to the feed choice, we evaluate several graph-only feed selection strategies and propose a motif-based coherent feed selection method. Experiments on the IBM-AML benchmark (HI-Small, LI-Small, HI-Medium) and the Elliptic Bitcoin transaction graph show that the proposed strategy yields markedly higher illicit ratios in the extracted subgraph than random and degree-based heuristics on Elliptic and the IBM-AML HI variants, while keeping the output compact.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Polarization Dynamics under Algorithmic Recommendations in LLM-based Online Social Networks

How do recommendation algorithms contribute to the formation of polarized opinions in online social networks? This question has been studied through empirical analyses of real platforms and mathematical models of opinion dynamics. Empirical studies capture user behavior but are often limited by noisy, incomplete, or inaccessible platform data, while mathematical models offer control and interpretability but usually rely on simplified opinion update rules. More recently, large language model (LLM)-based social simulations have provided an alternative for studying recommendation and opinion dynamics through natural-language interactions. However, how different ways of applying recommendations shape opinion dynamics remains underexplored. In this work, we provide a controlled comparison of two different recommendation mechanisms in an LLM-based online social network simulation. Edge Recommendation (ER) introduces new connections in the network, while Content-Exposure Recommendation (CR) exposes additional users to individual posts without modifying the underlying graph. Our framework represents users as LLM-based agents who interact in natural language while maintaining evolving opinion states. We measure polarization as opinion dispersion, extremization as the average distance of opinions from the neutral midpoint, and reinforcement as interactions that amplify already aligned opinions. Our results show higher mean polarization and extremization across recommendation conditions compared with the no-recommendation baseline, with absolute differences of up to $0.12$ in our main experiments.

cs.SI↗