Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.17674

AI Information Synthesis and Content Polarization

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can synthesize dispersed information into balanced and informative content, raising the possibility that AI may help reduce polarization. We show that this promise can be undermined by the strategic response of content producers. We develop a game-theoretic model in which consumers acquire information to make downstream decisions, content producers allocate limited informational capacity between broadly valuable vertical information and horizontally differentiated information, and AI provides an alternative source of synthesized information. The effects of AI unfold in three phases as its reliability increases. When reliability is low, AI has no effect on the market. At intermediate levels, AI disciplines prices without attracting consumers or changing content. When AI becomes sufficiently reliable, consumers begin to substitute toward it, and content producers respond by shifting informational capacity away from the vertical dimension and toward horizontally differentiated content, thereby increasing content polarization. The mechanism operates through audience composition: AI attracts consumers who are less well matched to individual producers, leaving producers with stronger incentives to cater to their remaining audiences. The polarization effect intensifies with AI reliability but weakens with greater competition among content producers. Our findings highlight a potential wedge between AI's direct and equilibrium effects: a technology that provides consumers with more balanced information can indirectly make the broader content ecosystem more polarized.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chang Liu, Yuting Zhu. 2026-10-13. AI Information Synthesis and Content Polarization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17674

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Self-ordered choice models

Consider an analyst who, for each menu of alternatives, observes a probability distribution over choices, reflecting heterogeneity in the population's choices. The analyst uses a choice model\textendash consisting of deterministic \textit{choice types} \textendash to explain the data, in the sense that mixtures over the admissible types reproduce the observed choice probabilities. A central difficulty is that such representations are typically non-unique. We introduce self-orderedness, a criterion ensuring that every probabilistic choice pattern the analyst can explain admits a unique and ordered representation. We show that self-ordered models are exactly those whose choice types form a \textit{lattice}. This equivalence provides a precise recipe to restrict or extend any choice model for unique ordered representation. Following this recipe, we identify the choice types that are essential for the unique ordered representation of random utility functions. This extension adds economically meaningful non-rational behaviors linked to choice overload and enables identification of the underlying order.

econ.TH↗

Screening with Advertisements

We investigate a seller's revenue-maximizing mechanism in a setting where a desirable good is sold together with an undesirable bad (e.g., advertisements) that generates third-party revenue. The buyer's private information is two-dimensional: valuation for the good and willingness to pay to avoid the bad. Building on the duality framework of Daskalakis, Deckelbaum, and Tzamos (2017), whose results extend to our setting, we formulate the seller's problem using a transformed measure $μ$ that depends on the third-party payment $k$. We provide a near-characterization for optimality of three pricing mechanisms commonly used in practice -- the Good-Only, Ad-Tiered, and Single-Bundle Posted Price -- and introduce a new class of tractable, interpretable two-dimensional orthant conditions on $μ$ for sufficiency. Economically, $k$ yields a clean comparative static: low $k$ excludes the bad, intermediate $k$ separates ad-tolerant and ad-averse buyers, and high $k$ bundles ads for all types.

econ.TH↗

Monotone Allocations without Single-Crossing: When to Bunch and When to Jump

We study one-dimensional screening when the Spence-Mirrlees condition fails along a monotone dividing curve, on which all types value marginal output equally. A single ratio, marginal distortion over marginal rent, governs the problem. When the relaxed solution stays in the positive region, non-decreasing optima in the positive single-crossing region are continuous if the ratio increases in the decision. When it crosses a flat curve and marginal rents are separable, every continuous contract is improved by a jump. When it crosses a strictly monotone curve, a contract that pools and jumps continues along the mirror of the pool if the ratio does not increase along it. Optimality among all implementable allocations, deterministic or random, is proved by a measure on the binding constraints whose weights are the same ratio; with constant curvatures and no crossing, it is also necessary. As applications, we solve problems of procurement and nonlinear pricing.

econ.TH↗