Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.18050

ndscape: a structural map of the nested dichotomy space

Abstract

Nested dichotomies (NDs) reduce multiclass classification to a tree of binary classifiers. Tree structure can change accuracy, bias, and variance, but the full space of structures has not been mapped in aggregate. We introduce ndscape, a two-dimensional mapping of ND structures based on depth-weighted structural tokens. We use this embedding to conduct what is, to our knowledge, the first bias-variance analysis across the ND structure space. In simulations with 6 to 10 classes, NDs with similar tree structures exhibit similar squared bias, variance, and squared probability loss, regardless of whether the binary classifier is logistic regression or a decision tree. Variance, however, follows mean root-to-leaf depth when logistic regression is used at each node, so flatter, more balanced NDs are more stable, whereas with decision-tree node models, variance is not associated with depth and differs little across ND structures. On six datasets with 6 to 19 classes, held-out accuracy, log loss, and prediction variance remain spatially organised on the same topology-only map. None of the six standard construction heuristics tested selects a tree from the best-performing cluster on any dataset, although some select high-performing individual trees. The ndscape embedding turns ND selection from one opaque construction step into a readable comparison of class groupings, exposing the upper-level splits that distinguish high-performing and stable regions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maxwell Dix-Matthews, Melinda Hodkiewicz, Adriano Polpo. 2026-10-13. ndscape: a structural map of the nested dichotomy space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18050

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Assumption-Lean Differential Variance Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Detection

The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is frequently estimated in clinical studies to refute a homogeneous treatment effect hypothesis. Under this regime, all patients making up the population experience identical benefit from a given treatment relative to a comparator. Uncovering heterogeneous treatment effects through inference about the CATE, however, requires that covariates truly modifying the treatment effect be reliably collected at baseline. CATE-based techniques will necessarily fail to detect violations when effect modifiers are omitted from the data due to, for example, resource constraints. Severe measurement error has a similar impact. Clinical decision makers can be misled as a result. To address these limitations, we prove that a practical homogeneous treatment effect hypothesis can be gauged through inference about contrasts of the potential outcomes' variances even when effect modifiers are missing from the data. We derive causal machine learning estimators of these contrasts and study their asymptotic properties. We establish that these estimators are doubly robust and asymptotically linear under mild conditions, permitting formal hypothesis testing about treatment effect heterogeneity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that these estimators' asymptotic guarantees are approximately achieved in finite-sample randomized and observational study data alike. These inference procedures are then used to detect heterogeneous treatment effects in the re-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating targeted temperature management in cardiac arrest patients.

stat.ME↗

Estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in clustered data with an application to analyzing caries and periodontal disease data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

The within-cluster subgroup composition of units can inform on the marginal distribution of those units outcomes, denoted informative subgroup size (ISS). Moreover, within-cluster subgroup composition of paired outcomes can allow one outcome to inform upon the marginal distribution of the other. If this type of ISS ignored, it can bias marginal association estimates by allowing subgroup composition to influence how clusters contribute to the analysis. We develop two weighting approaches for estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in this setting. The weights are derived using within-cluster resampling arguments and extend conventional cluster weighting to paired response subgroups. We adapt an existing test of marginal dependence to assess ISS by examining this subgroup structure in both directions. In simulated data exhibiting this bidirectional ISS, pair-based weighting reduced bias when association was primarily carried through the paired observations. These weights also allow scientifically or clinically meaningful dichotomizations to enter directly into the weighting scheme, with the choice of subgroup definition further improving estimation in several simulated settings. Application to NHANES oral-health data showed strong evidence of ISS for filled-surface outcomes across subgroups defined by clinical attachment loss and pocket depth, with the corresponding periodontal--caries associations generally small and positive. These methods provide a practical approach for estimating marginal association when paired subgroup composition is informative.

stat.ME↗

Functional Principal Component Analysis for Manifold-Indexed Data

Functional principal component analysis has traditionally focused on processes indexed by Euclidean domains, although functional observations increasingly arise on curved domains. We develop FPCA for real-valued processes observed with noise at discrete locations on a general Riemannian manifold. We estimate the mean and covariance functions using intrinsic kernel smoothing based on geodesic distance and a normal-coordinate volume correction, with a general weighting scheme accommodating unequal numbers of observations across subjects. We establish $L^2$ and uniform convergence rates for these estimators and derive corresponding error bounds for the estimated eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. These results quantify how manifold dimension, sampling frequency and weighting affect estimation accuracy and characterize the phase transition between sparse and dense sampling regimes. Simulation studies on the circle and sphere, together with real-data applications, illustrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methodology.

stat.ME↗