Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.18823

The Missile and the Toll: Two-Way Flow Through the Strait of Hormuz

Abstract

Tolls for safe passage and attacks on shipping are usually treated as mutually exclusive: either ships pay or attacks happen. We argue they are complementary. In a Stackelberg escalation game for the Strait of Hormuz, the enforcer chooses an attack intensity and a toll schedule; the response is to pay, cross exposed, wait, reroute, or exit. Attacks create the willingness to pay; tolls harvest it. The model predicts asymmetry across trade forms: a toll where the cargo owner can pay and the vessel owner will consent, and none where either fails. Any such payment is clandestine, but the model's implications are testable against freight rates, insurance premia, and incident reports.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bernhard K Meister. 2026-10-13. The Missile and the Toll: Two-Way Flow Through the Strait of Hormuz. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18823

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Mean Field Model of Consumption Inertia and Keeping Up with the Joneses

Households compare their living standard with others' and dislike changing it. We study consumption and investment when felicity depends on consumption relative to a benchmark, the population's geometric average consumption, and cuts in felicity weigh more than increases. Asset returns are exogenous. For finitely many types and arbitrary initial wealth and inherited standards, a mean field equilibrium exists under a weak interaction condition, and for fixed budget multipliers the benchmark is the fixed point of a contraction. In a complete market with common risk, a mean field equilibrium at empirical type frequencies is an exact Nash equilibrium of the finite game, for any preferences over relative consumption. We bound the gain from deviating when plans computed at another composition are used. We compute equilibria in which groups with different wealth, inherited standards, and loss aversion revise spending at different dates. With identical households and common risk, the unique symmetric equilibrium is the policy of a single loss averse household with modified curvature. In a baseline example, ignoring the inherited standard costs up to 17% of wealth, while small errors about the composition of the reference group cost less than 0.5%.

q-fin.PM↗

Ex Ante and Scenario-Conditional Value of Information in Dynamic Portfolio Choice

Portfolio decisions are often made under uncertainty about expected returns, and investors revise their beliefs as new information arrives. Although richer information generally cannot reduce optimized value ex ante, the trading strategy it induces need not improve on the strategy induced by a less informative information structure in every fixed-drift scenario. We introduce scenario-conditional expected utility and value of information to evaluate strategies selected under the investor's current belief. In a finite-horizon Gaussian portfolio choice model, we compare a fixed-belief investor, a price observer, and an attentive investor who also processes an auxiliary signal under an attention capacity constraint. Ex ante, price learning and auxiliary attention are valuable, and the total value of attention increases with capacity. Scenario-conditionally, learning creates a correction benefit by reducing the initial trading-position gap relative to the full-information strategy, but also a fluctuation cost through belief revisions, so the ex ante ranking can reverse. We derive the current-belief distribution of scenario-conditional value and the associated underperformance probability, defined as the probability of negative scenario-conditional value relative to fixed-belief choice. Over sufficiently short horizons, the scenario-conditional value of learning is negative when belief error is small relative to posterior uncertainty. For a given horizon, sufficiently high attention capacity yields a higher scenario-conditional value than any fixed finite-capacity benchmark across all drift scenarios. We also derive sharp convergence rates to full-information performance under Shannon and Tsallis technologies.

q-fin.PM↗

From Economic Explanation to Performance Improvement in Machine-Learning Portfolios

To extend conventional model-level feature importance to economically meaningful portfolio outcomes and decisions, we propose a local first-order attribution-propagation framework that maps allocation-function feature exposures to local sensitivities of sequential portfolio performance metrics. We relate the propagated attributions to Shapley values defined directly for portfolio objectives and derive statistical inference for Sharpe-ratio attributions. The resulting attribution-guided feature-exposure intervention enables post-training adaptation, translating portfolio-metric explanations into out-of-sample decisions without retraining the underlying allocation model. We further introduce temporal stabilisation and cross-model averaging as complementary regularisation mechanisms. Empirically, the interventions yield statistically significant improvements in net Sharpe ratios across different model classes.

q-fin.PM↗