Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.19335

Differentially Private Learning of Markov Chains: Near-Optimal Sample Complexity for Item and User Level Privacy

Abstract

Sequential data such as documents, conversations, and trajectories are naturally partitioned across users, motivating privacy guarantees that protect each user's entire trajectory. We initiate the study of privately estimating the transition matrix of a discrete ergodic Markov chain from N independent trajectories of length T, with arbitrary initial distributions, under maximum row-wise ell 1 error. Besides N, T, and the number of states, our bounds depend on the minimum stationary probability and the pseudo-spectral gap, which govern state coverage and mixing. Under item-level privacy, we give upper and lower bounds that separate the costs of sampling, state occupancy and mixing, and privacy. Under user-level privacy, we reduce the problem for sufficiently long trajectories to private product distribution estimation. Along the way, we establish optimal user-level private bounds for estimating products of discrete distributions, which may be of independent interest. In the user level setting, our bounds are nearly tight in the large T regime, whereas in the item-level setting, our bounds as tight up-to a non-private term.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Devansh Gupta, Cristóbal Guzman, Enayat Ullah. 2026-10-14. Differentially Private Learning of Markov Chains: Near-Optimal Sample Complexity for Item and User Level Privacy. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19335

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AI-Guided Assignments in Practice: Students' Experiences in a Large Introductory Statistics Course

Large language models (LLMs) raise new questions for instructors, among them how to integrate LLMs productively into coursework and what to evaluate in students' work when an LLM can produce much of it directly. LLM-guided homework assignments offer one answer. Instructors configure the LLM to guide students in ways that achieve specific pedagogical goals, such as recalling material, discovering new concepts, or critically evaluating deliberately flawed reasoning, and grade the full student--LLM conversation, and with it the student's reasoning, rather than only the final answer. In this paper, we report on the large-scale deployment of such assignments, implemented through LLteacher, an open-source tool that supports recall, discovery, and critical-thinking assignments, in a large introductory statistics course serving mostly pre-major undergraduates. Results on 134 students show meaningful gains in self-reported confidence, with over 80\% agreeing that the assignments improved their comprehension of course material and their ability to interpret statistical results; gains were largest among students who started with lower confidence, suggesting this approach may help narrow gaps in preparation. Interaction patterns varied widely, from long single messages to rapid iterative exchanges, and hallucinations, when present, were rarely disruptive to learning.

stat.OT↗

Examples of statistical practice in elementary particle physics for comparison with Mayo's severity concept

The field of elementary particle physics (also known as high energy physics) has strong traditions in frequentist inference, heavily influenced by Fisher and by Neyman and Pearson. While I am not aware of direct use and citation of Deborah Mayo's severity concept in the field, one might expect that ideas similar to severity were independently developed. Here, I describe typical practice that addresses the same issues that severity was developed to address, with some tentative comparisons with severity. I invite experts on severity to explain how they would apply severity in these cases and to discuss any differences.

stat.OT↗

Generative AI in Publishing: An Editors' Panel on Ethics and Policies

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping scholarly research faster than journals have developed stable norms for its use. This article presents an edited thematic account of a 2026 Joint Statistical Meetings panel that brought together editorial perspectives from mathematical statistics, data science, biomedical statistics, and general statistical scholarship. The discussion examines journal policies, disclosure, authorship and research integrity, peer-review confidentiality, researcher training, editorial workload, access, and possible future models of scholarly publishing. Panelists shared commitments to human accountability, the protection of confidential submissions, and disclosure of consequential assistance, while offering different recommendations on assistance with research ideas and proofs, disclosure requirements, automated review, and policy enforcement. By distinguishing shared principles from unresolved implementation questions, the article clarifies the choices facing statistical publishing and outlines an agenda for evaluating policies and practices as GenAI evolves. The account seeks to foster continued discussion of GenAI in scientific communication and encourage statistical organizations to develop more robust operational standards.

stat.OT↗